Posted on 02/21/2019 3:34:23 PM PST by walford
Yeeeeeeeahhhhhh...
Corey Haim is one of those names that brings instant thread-shitting on this site. A few very vocal and prolific members of this site have officially branded him as a liar, attention-seeker and self-aggrandising arsehole, don’tcha know?
His name is almost as dangerous as Milo Yiannopoulos, who is also (apparently) persona non-grata, and never to be mentioned on this site. :P
Hey, don’t say that too loud. They just haven’t thought of it yet.
2 wrongs don’t make a right
Does Epstein have a house there yet? Bubba?
The present law already has a loop hole, if it is “vaginal intercourse” sex that is involved, and that loop hole relieves the offender from the no more 10 years older than the victim standard, IF a judge in the case finds cause for that relief. It apparently does not allow for a judge to provide that same relief if it is not a case involving vaginal intercourse, if it involves some other sexual acts.
The question concerning the new suggested law is if it goes beyond providing that same relief, in cases where it is not vaginal intercourse and just exempts ALL such offenders - based on the no more than 10 years older standard - from having to file with the sex offenders registry, instead of like the other cases, as it is now, putting that question in the hands of the judge hearing the case.
In no case does the matter of a conviction of the crime seem to come into question, just whether or not being put on the offenders registry is mandatory or not.
The law is called ‘The NAMBLA Protection Act of 2019’. I hope they’ll defeat this.
Exactly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.