Just a distraction away from his signing of baby part trafficking as a result of their abortion law.
Leave him in office, and drape that photo around his neck every time he tries to pursue his agenda.
And use the photo in GOP campaign ads for the next 500 years.
What would the grounds for impeachment be?
Sorry but this guy isn’t getting impeached over this... and he shouldn’t be...
If all they have is some racially insensitive photo from 35 years ago, the only way he leaves is by resigning... Can’t see any serious impeachment happening over that.
But the left eating its own is always entertaining.
Go ahead, retain him. We can hang this albatross around the neck of the Dems for years to come.
THIS is what the Dems support.
We’ll all recall that we retained control of the chamber by one vote in a tied election in one district. If I were the speaker I wouldn’t touch impeachment with a ten foot pole. This is the rats problem and they need to deal with it. If they don’t a great issue to use against them in the next election. Plus you wouldn’t want to give the boys and girls in the Congress to try to analogies Northam to trump ( there’s no reasonable basis to do so, but that won’t stop them)
I like my popcorn salted with caramel thank you.
Over a picture of him from 1984? It’s not about the picture. That’s a distraction. The dems brought this up right away after the governor let the cat out of the bag over the dem party intentions over abortion - they plan to allow baby killing at will, with no restrictions, and to force us to pay for it.
He’ll do a ‘Clinton’ and say he must get down to doing the peoples’ business..............
Leave him be, let him twist in the wind.
He’s a democrat... already ‘the press’ is dropping the story.
Impeachment is only for behavior while in office. As much as I dislike Northam, he did not violate law while in office. His support for infanticide could be considered an ethics violation and he should be investigated for that. But a photo from 30 years past is not an impeachable offence, unless the accused is Republican.
If a reporter asked this question, the reply should be, while the picture is reprehensible, on what legal grounds would we have to impeach him?
This is a trend where the "offended parties" can go anywhere in anyone's life and find a reason to ruin them.
Even a blind man can see the danger in this because only liberals define these rules while republicans follow the rules.
Impeachment? For what? Is it a crime for him to have appeared in a racist costume 30 years ago? Now, if he just wants to resign out of shame, he’s welcome to do that, but I do not understand what possible grounds they could have for impeachment. (Other than the obvious of being a supporter of infanticide)
It is so much fun to watch Democrats and socialists “Hoist on their own Petard!”
For those not acquainted with the term, in the olden days a petard was a bomb to blow open the gates of a city. Often the man in charge of the bomb went up with it.
Democrats - aborting their voting base since 1973, replacing with illegals since 1986.
Impeach him for what? This country is moving from “You owe me an apology!” to “Kill them all and let God decide.”