1 posted on
01/25/2019 10:46:35 AM PST by
fishtank
To: fishtank
2 posted on
01/25/2019 10:48:10 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: fishtank
Darwin died in 1882.
I doubt he very much cares about any stupid fish.
Because.. you know.. dead and all.
To: fishtank
5 posted on
01/25/2019 10:50:20 AM PST by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: fishtank
But the new fossil shows that hagfish 100 million years ago were remarkably similar to hagfish today, suggesting that their specialized features accumulated gradually over time. I don't how this logically follows.
I have something today. I had this thing 100 million years ago. Therefore, it accumulated gradually. WHAT?!? This is actually evidence of an absence of evolution within the chosen timeframe.
8 posted on
01/25/2019 10:55:25 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: fishtank
Darwinian theory does not depend on human ability to explain particular features.
Like any theory, it explains a lot.
Saying that we do not understand a particular example only means we do not understand a particular example.
It does not invalidate Darwinian theory.
9 posted on
01/25/2019 10:55:28 AM PST by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: fishtank
Darwin is haunted by zombie Shrillery?
To: fishtank
OK so they evolved to do this.
You need to understand TToE to attack it.
You don’t nor do the authors.
14 posted on
01/25/2019 11:00:43 AM PST by
freedumb2003
(As always IMHO)
To: fishtank
Do the people at “Creation Evolution Headlines” ever do any original research?
18 posted on
01/25/2019 11:08:02 AM PST by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: fishtank
Evolutionary perfection with no genetic mutation that improved on the original
21 posted on
01/25/2019 11:11:06 AM PST by
bert
( (KE. N.P. N.C. +12) Pri ncess Gray Beaver, for President?)
To: fishtank; marktwain
"Haunts?" From article: "An expert blames the lack of fossil evidence on the fact that these slippery sausage-like fish dont have hard parts, like bones and hard teeth. He says, its really difficult for them to get preserved into the fossil record."
The hagfish poses very little challenge to Darwin/Evolution compared to the gaps in the fossil records for many creatures that could/should have left transitional fossil records.
22 posted on
01/25/2019 11:18:44 AM PST by
drpix
To: fishtank
If looking like hillary and spitting slime works, then who needs evolution?
26 posted on
01/25/2019 11:30:56 AM PST by
I want the USA back
(Lying Media: willing and eager allies of the hate-America left.)
To: fishtank
Less dangerous related species of the more common slime-spewing Hoggfish.
To: fishtank
WATCH OUT!! HAGFISH IS GONNA SPEW!!
31 posted on
01/25/2019 11:51:34 AM PST by
Slyfox
(Not my circus, not my monkeys)
To: fishtank
“No other creature has this slime-making ability. There is no line of descent showing where it came from.”
Actually, pretty much all vertebrates can make “slime”. This animal just happens to have a specialized slime with these properties.
It is a vertebrate, by DNA/mRNA testing, related most closely with lampreys. It retains many primitive features, but has a notochord, the hallmark of vertebrates.
33 posted on
01/25/2019 12:00:34 PM PST by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson