Right to protest doesn’t allow you intimidate others (pro-abortion thrash)

Press Reader ^ | 12 January 2019 | Martina Devlin

[I-ambush]

Interesting question in the first paragraph of the article. However, a better analogy would be this: you believe in “death do us part,” but don’t want to be married. Therefore, you decide to hire someone to murder your husband. Am I wrong to talk you out of it?

[Rapscallion]

So, children being killed = OK, People having polarized opinions = Not OK?

Are unable to read what I wrote or just a militant donkey-butt?

[Rapscallion]

No doubt or defamation from you or anybody else, can nullify that fact.

Go back and look. You started with the personal name calling/insults.

[joma89]

I bet martina thinks the world of antifa.

JoMa

[Hugh the Scot]

I read what you wrote (in the post I replied to) and asked you for clarification.

Now this gibberish that you’ve come back with is a different matter... It sounds like the railings of a bloke who KNOWS he’s wrong and is too stubborn to rethink his position.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I looked. What “personal name calling”?

[norwaypinesavage]

"Imagine having to pass protesters on your way into court, where a judge is ready to deal with your divorce application"

You mean like Jeff Bezos?

[lowbridge]

He studied karate on youtube.

[trebb]

What a profound statement of the creed that nobody should ever grow up and mature mentally because the real world is full of uncomfortable situations and our decisions affect them big time...keep everyone’s head buried in the sand so they never become critical thinkers because critical thinkers rebel against those who would keep them ignorant.