Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/12/2019 10:30:38 AM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: yesthatjallen

Soros could set a good example by voluntarily paying 70%.


2 posted on 01/12/2019 10:32:25 AM PST by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

“the fact that people are not paying their fair share is a problem and the millionaires and billionaires are the ones where that has to rest.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No mention of the 50% of the people who don’t pay a penny.


3 posted on 01/12/2019 10:32:38 AM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Here’s your “debate” for you: NO


4 posted on 01/12/2019 10:34:53 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

All the Rat voters, if they were true believers, could begin sending in that extra money today. No need to wait for Congress and the President to make a change. Rats believe they are not taxed enough - put up time.


5 posted on 01/12/2019 10:35:05 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

She should pay 70% of her salary as an example of pure socialism.


6 posted on 01/12/2019 10:35:21 AM PST by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Anyone that wants high tax rates like that should impose it on themselves and send it to Uncle Sam. Why wait? Just do it.


7 posted on 01/12/2019 10:35:40 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Go for it. Remind Americans why we shouldn’t vote for Democrats (they should change their name to Socialists)


9 posted on 01/12/2019 10:36:31 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

In 1979 I was making $16.64 an hour working construction. My check was $364 take home and $344 federal taxes...Interest rates were 18% and higher.


10 posted on 01/12/2019 10:39:36 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Why not just make it 100%, and if you have the Left Politics, you get your Mealy Meal?


12 posted on 01/12/2019 10:42:46 AM PST by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

The GOP should respond by proposing a constitutional amendment that limits the Government to a single tax rate that get applied equally to all citizens.


13 posted on 01/12/2019 10:42:52 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Only 52 percent of Americans pay income taxes and this moron, Grijalva, says he wants to make sure everyone is carrying the load. Grijalva is carrying and pimping the biggest “load” of all and we’re supposed to believe the moron.


16 posted on 01/12/2019 10:49:21 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

The only thing O’casio “sparks”, are face-palms.


17 posted on 01/12/2019 10:51:35 AM PST by FrankR (Make America Great Again, and Keep It That Way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

I get concerned to hear liberals say, we need the wealthy for pay their fair share.

If someone is complying with our tax laws, aren’t they by definition, paying Their fsir share?

What about the facts, such as how the top 15% of income earners pay something like 75% of all income tax revenue?

What about the fact that we have a graduated income tax system, so that those at higher income levels are already paying higher marginal tax rates?

What do they people want? Confiscatory taxation?


18 posted on 01/12/2019 10:53:21 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

I am not to sure she doesn’t make a point. We need to confiscate enough of the rich in America’s wealth to pay of the debt! Allow so much for each person in the family and take the rest from those who are multi millionaires.


19 posted on 01/12/2019 10:54:57 AM PST by Herman Ball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

As if anyone actually draws such salaries any more. Good luck morons.


24 posted on 01/12/2019 10:59:15 AM PST by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Ok, that’s even of this bs. Communists, real communists, not ‘’democratic socialism’’, communism. Time for a 2nd. solution.


26 posted on 01/12/2019 11:00:42 AM PST by jmacusa (Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

What no one talks about is that when the country has those high tax rates no one paid them. There were a great many tax deduction you could take and that reduced the tax bite a great deal.

Also that was the post war period when this country was rebuilding the rest of the world, we were a creditor nation and for about 25 years after the war we were the top dog with very little competition. All that has now changed.

Going back to those kind of high rates would probably destroy what is left of the country.


30 posted on 01/12/2019 11:04:48 AM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Would Congress be excluded?


31 posted on 01/12/2019 11:07:40 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
House Democrats are treading carefully when it comes to talk of a 70 percent marginal tax rate on income above $10 million, an idea floated by freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) in a recent “60 Minutes” interview.

Not good enough.

The marginal rates should be:

10,000,000+ = 190%.
5,000,000 - 10,000,000 = 175%.
1,000,000 - 5,000,000 = 130%.
500,000 - 1,000,000 = 120%.
200,000 - 500,000 = 115%.
100,000 - 200,000 = 112%.
70,000 - 100,000 = 110%.
50,000 - 70,000 = 108%.
25,000 - 50,000 = 107%.
10,000 - 20,000 = 106%.
Under 10,000 = 105%.

34 posted on 01/12/2019 11:09:33 AM PST by Lazamataz (You know, when I advised Democrats to vote AFTER Nov 6th, I didn't think they'd actually DO it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

The young ones don’t know that few people will pay 70%.

They’ll find a workaround, like always.

I read some years back that H. Ross Perot at the time was making $360 million a year and paying 8% of it back in income taxes. The top rate at the time was 39.5%.

High tax rates don’t hurt the rich. They hurt the small business person who has that couple of big years near the end of his/her career, and employed people finally making a high salary has they approach retirement.

It’s called screwing the people who do things right and produce.


37 posted on 01/12/2019 11:12:17 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (The internet has driven the world mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson