Posted on 12/13/2018 9:04:33 AM PST by RightGeek
TRUMP.45 should have his OWN TRUMPER! to TRUMP.45 AMERICANS! and Non-AINOs back to THE TRUMPER!
++++++
Gunny G@PlanetWTF?
SemperTRUMP.45!
********************************************
“Self moderation”
I always thought “report this post” type buttons should delete your account.
It’ll be interesting to see if twitter hits them up for patent violations.
Maybe the defense would be that the system is improved because it doesn’t censor but censorship would not be part of twitter patents/copyrights.
Any patent lawyers out there?
[[The pattern is that a committment to free speech will allow Jew-haters and true racists to drive rational users away.]]
Exactly, I’ve seen it happen a couple of times- unfortunately- the problem is that when there aren’t any clear ground rules, people will always abuse the ‘freedom’ they are given and ruin it for everyone- Some peopel just aren’t happy unless they are making other people’s lives miserable sadly-
[[Hope they establish clear rules and enforce them.]]
Me too-
but better yet, I’d love to see a ‘conservative only’ twitter-like site- I mean why not? Twitter is driving conservatives away by censoring them- so why not have a site that censors liberals in return? This would drive the left absolutely mental- Well, you know what i mean- more mental-
Like Adam Corolla and Dennis Prager said a little while ago- it’s time conservatives STOP apologizing for being conservatives and people of morals- Start a conservative ONLY site, do NOT apologize for it- the heck with ‘diversity’- The left sure aren’t diverse on their sites!
[[Of course, you cannot forward stories or get notified of new tweets.]]
Copy, Paste works
the transition from ordered liberty, limited government, and natural rights to totalitarianism, socialism, and statism requires censorship, confiscatory taxation, and gun confiscation
If it was not for our President, I would have dropped twitter months ago.
So PDJT is keeping both Twitter and CNN alive, ha
I have a Twitter account and enjoy sharing with my 3000+ like-minded patriots, who love President Trump and who are on top of all of the Democrats and Deep State news that can be disseminated in a flash.
bkmk
So sez the establishment shill.
In other words, you believe the First Amendment applies to privately owned social media sites, like Free Republic, and that owners/managers have no power over content. Noted.
You realizer, don’t you, that you have dragged down the collective IQ of FR closer to double digits?
Downloaded the iPhone app.
Ditto
Tech bookmark.
Is John Matze an American born person, I wonder.
We need someone with a sense of American Exceptional quality.
Why in the world, choose a French name. Not very smart for someone with common sense marketing.
Freezoxee.com runs like Facebook, but without the leftwing bias, and also has a video uploading side, Zox.ee.
Exactly, Ive seen it happen a couple of times- unfortunately- the problem is that when there arent any clear ground rules, people will always abuse the freedom they are given and ruin it for everyone - Some people just arent happy unless they are making other peoples lives miserable sadlyThe pattern is that a committment to free speech will allow Jew-haters and true racists to drive rational users away.
There should be an opportunity for third parties to block content for the voluntary use of those who want it.Think of it this way: FR is a conservative and (mostly) family friendly site because of JimRob and his Moderators. Suppose that FRs mods went to work providing censorship of this new Twitter as a paid subscription service. You join the platform, and you pay mods whom you elect to trust to make it congenial to the FR community. And maybe there would be a way to subscribe to two such services - and be able to see anything that either one would allow to pass.
This isnt necessarily a call for FR to undertake such a project, only an illustrative example. But if someone(s) did do this, it would allow the platform itself to be neutral without necessarily falling victim to the phenomenon you decry.
And maybe it could be done via competing wikis . . .
well the point is that your scenario is introducing censorship- moderation to keep it ‘family friendly’- while sites like he article mention are touting non censorship, non-moderation- so i believe they will turn into Jew-Hating, Christian-hating site in a short period of time
There’s no ‘happy medium’- either the site will censor, or moderate posts- or they won’t- those that don’t will turn into hate-fest sites very quickly=-
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.