Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State regulators say surcharge on text messaging would help fund programs
San Jose Mercury ^ | December 12, 2018 | John Woolfolk

Posted on 12/12/2018 6:21:06 AM PST by artichokegrower

Texting your sweetheart that you’re on your way home? California may soon charge you for that.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2manylaws; 2manytaxes; ca; california; commiefornia; democrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: artichokegrower

Liberals always look at things through a static lens: Tax texts and people will stop texting and start calling...


21 posted on 12/12/2018 6:40:08 AM PST by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtech
the problem though....is the virus is spreading.

libs hate spending their own money....they just want to spend your money.

22 posted on 12/12/2018 6:40:17 AM PST by ealgeone (SCRIPTURE DOES NOT CHANGE! However, Roman Catholicism has, does, and will change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

CalaTaxachussetts.


23 posted on 12/12/2018 6:44:25 AM PST by CptnObvious (Question her now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

“Politicians say more taxes will solve EVERYTHING” - ‘Ball Of Confusion’ by The Temptations, 1971.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmRsWdK0PRI

47 years later...


24 posted on 12/12/2018 6:44:31 AM PST by BBB333 (The Power Of Trump Compels You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

No, my sweetie is texting me.

Not the other way around.

And California is going to make the women folk real angry if they tax their little texty phones.


25 posted on 12/12/2018 6:44:38 AM PST by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

“But they add that under the regulators’ proposal the charge could be applied retroactively for five years”

I guess that pesky prohibition against ex post facto laws doesn’t apply to taxes disguised as “fees”.


26 posted on 12/12/2018 6:44:45 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Twitter is Trump's laser pointer and the media are all cats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Marxism, liberalism, and outright theft. Tax and spend with no end or limits — welcome to our tyrannical, one-party state. Buying control, votes and a dependency class.


27 posted on 12/12/2018 6:44:49 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Ok folks, lets use the proper term. It is not a “surcharge”, it is a TAX.


28 posted on 12/12/2018 6:45:03 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
I say go for it. Millennials text all the time. They vote for guess who? Screw them. They can learn the hard way.

This won't affect me all that much. I find texting to be tedious and slow with my flip phone and only send out a few texts per year. However, millennials, who voted these politicians in, will be hit hardest.

29 posted on 12/12/2018 6:45:04 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

California: The world’s largest insane asylum.

- -

Yes, indeed it is. The real trick will be to NOT let FedGov bail out the MFs when the state goes bankrupt.


30 posted on 12/12/2018 6:46:34 AM PST by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Notice the weasel word "may". If you are the one person in a hundred who calls rather than texts you might pay less in taxes. Maybe.

I have one question: What is texting? I mean: Am I "texting" right now, for instance?

Or am I that one person in a hundred? (But I don't have a mobile phone, either.)

Regards,

31 posted on 12/12/2018 6:46:53 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
So the case for the surcharge is that the "Public Purpose Program" budget has climbed from $670 million in 2011 to $998 million last year

You know, I just cannot see any other way out of this problem other than raising taxes. Nope, not a single other way to solve this. It's a real conundrum it is.

32 posted on 12/12/2018 6:49:47 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Its time for a yellow-vest protest in California


33 posted on 12/12/2018 6:49:53 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

You didn’t read the article.


34 posted on 12/12/2018 6:51:38 AM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Welfare stares need warm bodies to keep their House seats. In their infinite lack of wisdom, states are replacing fleeing makers with takers. Which will not end well for welfare states or the folks sucking off their teats.

~~~

But that’s why we have the federal government.
Are states too big to fail?
California has a huge economy.
They believe they can do anything they want and silicone valley and their huge aggricultural exports will save them, and it probably will still, for quite some time. It has before. And when it doesn’t,... they will cry that the tax burden needs to be shared more with the rest of the country.


35 posted on 12/12/2018 6:52:07 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Wasn’t there an urban legend going around how the USPS would be taxing email at five cents each?


36 posted on 12/12/2018 6:54:07 AM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
You didn’t read the article.

You mean the part how it'll be a flat fee on everyone's phone bill and not actually a tax on individual text messages?

37 posted on 12/12/2018 6:54:43 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

If California wants the poor to have phone, convince, (or force), the faggot that runs Apple to give them away. Problem solved.


38 posted on 12/12/2018 6:55:50 AM PST by csvset (illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Charge for oxygen used and then for the CO2 exhaled. Perfect


39 posted on 12/12/2018 6:57:12 AM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is EVIL and needs to be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

California is using this proposal as a straw man....if it passes then the next tax will be on taking a dump. They are trying to figure out if the crap should be taken to a local tax office and weighed, then apply the tax, or just charge a flat rate.


40 posted on 12/12/2018 6:57:53 AM PST by Meadow Muffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson