Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2

SCJ Thomas rebuttal:

“But these cases are not about abortion rights,” he continued. “They are about private rights of action under the Medicaid Act. Resolving the question presented here would not even affect Planned Parenthood’s ability to challenge the States’ decisions.”

“Some tenuous connection to a politically fraught issue does not justify abdicating our judicial duty,” Thomas concluded.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1492_g3bi.pdf


123 posted on 12/10/2018 9:34:54 AM PST by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: huldah1776

Credit where credit is due, GWB knocked it out of the park with Justice Thomas.


125 posted on 12/10/2018 9:38:22 AM PST by proust ("The rule is, jam tomorrow and jam yesterday, but never jam today.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: huldah1776

Thank you.

I have serious doubts that Kav is smarter/better than Thomas.


163 posted on 12/10/2018 1:08:22 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson