[yesthatjallen]

Because the election isn't over until the Democrat wins.

[Red Badger]

But in CALIFORNIA it’s just fine and dandy!....................

[SMGFan]

Dems cry foul in undecided N.C. race

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/419965-dems-cry-foul-in-undecided-nc-race

Why is GOP letting those stolen House seats in CA slide?

[Red Badger]

“And … only if it’s impossible to determine if the winner is a DEMOCRAT, would we take the extraordinary step of calling for a new election.” .................there, fixed it................

[FlingWingFlyer]

Wouldn’t you just love to belt this Pelosi commie b*tch it the friggin’ mouth? A commie whore running the House of Representatives. Perfect. A sick joke America.

[ssaftler]

“This is bigger than that one seat. This is about undermining the integrity of our election of more Democrats.”

Getting her nose in shape for the next 2 years, I see.

[Political Junkie Too]

No new elections. It's not in the Constitution.

What IS in the Constitution is that the House can refuse to seat the winner.

Make Pelosi's first act as Speaker be to reject incoming Republicans, and then smear her with that for the next two years.

-PJ

[noiseman]

If the Republican in the race did commit fraud, then it absolutely must be addressed so that the election result is fair and correct. See dems?...that wasn’t so hard. Now that we’ve addressed the possible rare raindrop of fraud on our side, howsabout you guys take an objective look at the ocean of fraud on your side?

I know....just dreaming.

[struggle]

They’re trying to spin this as a Republican issue, but I think this will be dropped quickly next week and Harris put in office.

The real issue is the “Bladen County Improvement Group” (A Dem PAC) where all of this absentee fraud started coming from in 2010. Dowless (the guy they’re accusing) used to work with them, split of in 2014, and started doing the same thing for Republicans.

They’ve already identified others with BCIG that have signed out for hundreds of absentee ballots alone. This is a Dem tactic which they tried to frame on Republicans, and now is backfiring.

[DarthVader]

We will call for several too.

[ZOOKER]

Serious issues here, I think. Absentee ballots again...

Time to simplify, I think.

(1) early and absentee ballots may not be delivered to the polling locations by private individuals, only by the USPS.

(2) Post offices will, by Law, remain open on election day until the polls close. Postal employees will be available to collect and postmark ballots. (They do the same thing on April 15th for taxes)

(3)Any ballots arriving any other way, or postmarked after the polls close, are invalid.

Interfering with the delivery of USPS mail is a Federal crime. For election ballots, I think a 10-year minimum sentence is reasonable...

[CharlesWayneCT]

I’m confused as to why, if they don’t finish by December 21st, the EXISTING congress doesn’t take up the matter and resolve it.

After all, this is about an election for which new members are not seated until noon on the 3rd, including this “contested” one.

So why would the NEWLY seated people AFTER noon on the 3rd get to decide whether one person GETS seated at noon on the 3rd.

Let the new leadership try to expel him.