Posted on 11/28/2018 9:21:20 AM PST by jazusamo
Retired Gen. Stanley McChrystals discussions have been something thats deeply disturbing to a lot of thoughtful people. The fact that he would take on the President in this vitriolic manner, I think is pretty upsetting to people.
Isn’t McChrystal on cnn regularly?
They're all government employees?
Trump talks too rough for this general?
There, folks, is the reason why we cant win in Afghanistan.
Trump said something mean about my friends!
Sounds like a 10 year old girl.
This guy was a general.
Our enemies in Afghanistan are smiling about this.
Just another gun grabber with stars on his shoulder.
You can count on anyone who kissed Clintons and Obama’s ring for stars as being domestic enemies to the republic.
Gen McChrystal flooded gays into the military.
Thanks for posting your personal experience and for your service.
There were many threads here about what you posted, especially his restrictive rules of engagement.
Same old playbook. SomeonecattacksxTrump first and when Trump fires back suddenly Trump is the aggressor and how disturbing it is. SHEESH!!
Go and watch the movie: War Machine. It was the basic story of McChrystal and his ‘period/era’ in Afghanistan. It was a satire-type movie but you have to laugh over the characterization of McChrystal. A number of individuals have made the comment that since the war-period of the 1990s (Balkans, Iraq, Afghanistan)....that the Army has brought a number of leaders up who simply weren’t qualified for the rank.
Let's Wrap This Baby Up, Folks!
Harris and Gillibrand - you can’t question the ethics of women
Comey - you can’t question the ethics of the FBI
Brennan - you can’t question the intelligence community
CNN- you can’t question the practices of media
Roberts - you can’t question the politics of the judiciary
McChrystal - you can’t question the ethics of military or its members
America is run by the deep state - which you can’t question.
Before I get accused of the same thing, I have the utmost respect for our retired and active duty military personnel. Anyone willing to make that sacrifice for our country is deserving of our respect.
BUT That service does NOT give you some special pass or privilege to be above criticism, reproach or entitle you to instant credibility on anything and everything.
Argue with McRaven about military strategy, no. But refuse to be cowed when he enters an arena that is outside his lane. HELL YA.
sit down, McChrystal. McRaven decided to become a political animal, which puts his service record in second seat, and opened the door for anyone to criticize his political opinions.
And there is the entire reason for this non-story story; to push a book no one is going to read.
If I remember correctly you're right, or at least was accused of it.
I don’t remember Trump ever attacking a serving military officer. Only those who had retired and who were speaking as private citizens.
Fired? Yes. Publically attacked? No.
meh
The guy who couldnt control his troops
This just in: John McCain is still dead.
His use of the phrase, ". . . thoughtful people," implies that the current President is not "thoughtful" in the manner desired by Progressives; yet, facts on the ground seem to dispute his premise. That must just gall such a "thoughtful" General who failed to achieve missions to improve the critical conditions America faced during his time of duty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.