Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats boycott another hearing for Trump judicial nominees
The Washington Times ^ | October 24, 2018 | Alex Swoyer

Posted on 10/24/2018 10:10:20 AM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: mass55th

It’s a shame they don’t have rules in the Senate that prohibit boycotting by committee members when it comes to Constitutional duties.

DiFi agreed to these hearings and then welched.


21 posted on 10/24/2018 10:35:06 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Why is the constitution considered “far right wing”


22 posted on 10/24/2018 10:38:06 AM PDT by dsrtsage (For Leftists, World History starts every day at breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They must be out placing bombs in mail boxes of prominent Dummocrats.


23 posted on 10/24/2018 10:42:54 AM PDT by Mouton (The media is the enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

A hearing (”taking down sworn testimony”) can be done with only a single senator if such a hearing has been scheduled according to rules. This actually happens more often than might be thought because transcripts are available.

At least two minority party members are required to pass such a nomination to the floor.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/rules

...1. Seven Members of the Committee, actually present, shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of discussing business. Nine Members of the Committee, including at least two Members of the minority, shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting business. No bill, matter, or nomination shall be ordered reported from the Committee, however, unless a majority of the Committee is actually present at the time such action is taken and a majority of those present support the action taken.

2. For the purpose of taking down sworn testimony, a quorum of the Committee and each Subcommittee thereof, now or hereafter appointed, shall consist of one Senator...


24 posted on 10/24/2018 10:42:58 AM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Mitch wont put the senate on official recess since Trump would replace Sessions.


25 posted on 10/24/2018 10:53:49 AM PDT by Jaysin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla
CA Senators refuse to return blue slips

It used to be recognized as a refactor filibuster, but now Grassley has said the Blue slip is part of ADVISE and consent. And not turning it in means you have advised, but the the full Senate gets to consent.

26 posted on 10/24/2018 10:55:45 AM PDT by 11th_VA ("When passions are most inflamed, fairness is most in jeopardy." - Susan Collins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

“The Judiciary Committee heard from four nominees,”

seems they still had hearing, so seems things stayed on track though some chose to shirk their duty to their constituents to be there in person as they should be if on the committee and Di approved this time of year for the meetings.

bet they still get their salary


27 posted on 10/24/2018 11:06:29 AM PDT by b4me (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Vote, and confirm the Judges w/o the rats-—Grow a set Republican senators!!
You got an ok start w Kavanaugh, now grow some!!!


28 posted on 10/24/2018 11:33:23 AM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler; jazusamo

“Can they proceed without the ‘rats?”

Yep.

“criticized the GOP for moving ahead with the hearings”

The Dems made a deal to move these nominess, and double-crossed immediately. Grassley just drives on.


29 posted on 10/24/2018 11:37:29 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

So can the Dems delay this procedure indefinitely just by not showing up? How would judges ever get confirmed?


30 posted on 10/24/2018 1:33:09 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (..Do not be frightened, and do not be dismayed, for the Lord your God is with you.. Joshua 1:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

No.

Senate Majority Leader can bypass the committee and bring it to the floor. Or senators can be arrested and carried to meetings (it’s happened before!).

These kinds of delays are just stunts, and give permission to the other party to pull the same stunts at some point in the future.

This is kamikaze stuff with no thought of their own future.


31 posted on 10/24/2018 1:47:49 PM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Whew, thanks for the info.


32 posted on 10/24/2018 2:55:40 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (..Do not be frightened, and do not be dismayed, for the Lord your God is with you.. Joshua 1:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson