If they don’t want to make wedding pictures for same sex couples, their only recourse is shut down their business.
A business that serves the public has to abide by non-discrimination principles. Its the law.
We don’t get to choose what laws we will obey.
Why do I get the idea that the end game of these people is to declare male + female marriage perverted and illegal?
26] Then went the officer with the ministers, and brought them without violence; for they feared the people, lest they should be stoned. [27] And when they had brought them, they set them before the council. And the high priest asked them, [28] Saying: Commanding we commanded you, that you should not teach in this name; and behold, you have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and you have a mind to bring the blood of this man upon us. [29] But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men. [30] The God of our fathers hath raised up Jesus, whom you put to death, hanging him upon a tree.
Acts 5:29
Wrong answer!
We might not get to choose which laws we obey, but we DO get to choose which laws we choose to organize to overturn.
Wow...you make a great sheep.
That’s the language of a statist thug. Surely you’re not a statist thug are you?
To agree with the sentiment you offered, one must place statutory law at the state level above the free exercise clause of the first amendment and the incorporation thereof to the states.
That is why I disagree with you, FRiend.