Dr. Bruce Banner?
The more I read, the more I think a LOT of people have had her back.
And if you’re in CA. multiply the stupidity by a series of magnitudes.
Whew! For a second I feared that she had the support of David Banner.
Thank you Christine. We have your back.”....and Soro’s cash
They should hang a pair of kneepads from that stupid banner.
This broad will be a folk hero after another week of this idiocy.
Not to mention silly and childish. Our nation has become a laughing stock around the world.
I feel sorry for JimRob and JohnRob when the lunatics run San Jose.
Here are some of the senators who are making sure that feminists have the time for the campaign to stop the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh. They don’t want an honest Supreme Court to properly handle any cases involving President Trump or your constitutional rights (2nd Amendment, 4th Amendment, etc.).
According to this Democrat publication tracking senators for the deluge of messages from manhaters and homos, the following Republicans (who bow to the feminist left) want more information and to hear testimony from Blasey and Kavanaugh.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/17/17870570/kavanaugh-vote-delay-senate-tracker
Roy Blunt (R-MO)
Susan Collins (R-ME)
Bob Corker (R-TN)
Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Charles Grassley (R-IA)
Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
Well, Palo Alto is in Freakifornia. So, no surprise there.
We have your back - Satan has the rest.
Calculating Leftist attempting to slander a fine man.
According to rumor, lots of guys also had Christine “Blousey’s” back in H.S. and college
Below it read: “Any volunteers for when Ginsburg dies?”
I thought she was having death threats ans she wanted to keep her name out of it?
The fact that there is a political conspiracy in place against constitutional, limited, government - and against judges such as Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh who stand for it - hales back much further back in time than the vast right wing conspiracy . . . against my husband claim made by Hillary Clinton twenty years ago. That has been undeniable for so long that it hales back almost to the time referred to in Mrs. Fords complaint against Judge Kavenaugh.
Even by Ms. Ford's own telling, in the putative incident:
And the truth of the charges alleged by Ms. Ford against Judge Kavenaugh cannot actually matter.
- nobody was killed.
- the prestige of the US government was not compromised by the brutalizing and murder of a US ambassador.
- nobody spent a night in terror and fighting for their lives without support from their U.S. government employer.
- the incident putatively happened way back in 1982. No less than a third of the people who were alive in America in 1982 - have died by now. In that perspective, is Ms. Fords angst actually the only thing that matters?
So the question for Senator Feinstein, is
- It will never be clear that the charges are true - and it will never be clear that they are false. The charge is too indefinite and witness-free. It asks Judge Kavenaugh to prove a negative.
What difference, at this point, does it make?"
I’m in support of her flying, too. But news reports say she’s afraid of flying.
;-)