Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Full Title: Justice to convene meeting on whether social media companies are 'intentionally stifling' free speech

Just like his idol, Teddy Roosevelt, it looks like Trump is going after the Big Media Trusts!!!

Trust Buster Trump! I like that...

1 posted on 09/05/2018 11:31:40 AM PDT by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tcrlaf

2 posted on 09/05/2018 11:33:44 AM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

Notice the DOJ goes to talk with Lawyers.
In 30 min I could give him the names of probably 100 engineers who have been silenced with threat of termination for even saying they voted for Trump.

Go back to sleep, Sessions.
You are WAY out of your league.


3 posted on 09/05/2018 11:35:07 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

A baker can be required to bake for perverts, in violation of the baker’s religious beliefs and positive values. Logically, that means that a group of petty tyrants can also be required to provide a public accommodation for decent people in violation of their complete absence of religious beliefs and positive values.


4 posted on 09/05/2018 11:42:09 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
Just like his idol, Teddy Roosevelt, it looks like Trump is going after the Big Media Trusts!!!

There is a major difference between now and then.

Now, the Big Trust companies are crony companies conspiring with Big Government.

6 posted on 09/05/2018 11:47:03 AM PDT by FreeReign (Rudy: Sessions is recused from everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

You should be able to type FIRE! in a crowded chatroom.


8 posted on 09/05/2018 11:55:48 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (alea iacta est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

I think first they need to define and what point does social media become a public forum with an expectation of free speech and not a private service.

What’s the difference between facebook, twitter, and FreeRepublic?

Freerepublic states up front that it is a conservative discussion site. Specifically...”Free Republic is a site dedicated to the concerns of traditional grassroots conservative activists. We’re here to discuss and advance our conservative causes in a more or less liberal-free environment. We’re not here to debate liberals. We do not want our pages filled with their arrogant, obnoxious, repugnant bile. Liberals, usurpers, and other assorted malcontents are considered unwelcome trolls on FR and their accounts and or posts will be summarily dismissed at the convenience of the site administrators.”

Facebook and twitter, don’t openly promote an agenda, but evidence is that they secretly promote an agenda.


9 posted on 09/05/2018 11:57:01 AM PDT by DannyTN (uit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
He's on the job! Image Gallery windows 98 computer
11 posted on 09/05/2018 12:03:15 PM PDT by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

It’s more than just the social media. It’s the MSM too. They’re no longer even pretending to be unbiased. Their licenses should be revoked and they need to be removed from the air. If they want to continue with a YouTube channel, no problem. Same with the university charters for academia. They’re also no longer even pretending to be unbiased. No more federal grant money or tuition money. There’s more than one way to skin a cat.


13 posted on 09/05/2018 12:13:59 PM PDT by afsnco (18 of 20 in AF JAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
Justice to convene meeting on whether social media companies are stifling free speech

Good. If freedom of speech is not forced to be applied to all private communications companies, it will not long survive in this nation.

16 posted on 09/05/2018 12:34:49 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


23 posted on 09/05/2018 12:58:19 PM PDT by bitt (We know not what course others may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

I found it offensive when the head of Twitter gave a veiled warning to President Trump that no one was immune from being thrown off the platform. I hope conservatives get together and start a new type of Twitter. President Trump can tweet there and then the media would still have to report what he said that day.


26 posted on 09/05/2018 1:17:55 PM PDT by Ciexyz (I have one issue and it's my economic well-being.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

It is one thing for a corporation to publicly announce they are ceasing to allow a point of view. It is bordering on anti-trust for several to get together and agree to censor a particular point of view.


33 posted on 09/05/2018 2:24:16 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Democratic socialism is when the majority of people vote to steal your property.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson