Posted on 08/21/2018 1:39:03 PM PDT by EdnaMode
So was the fugutive slave act
Everything is settled law, til Scotus unsettles it!
Agree.
Whatever Collins needs to hear to make her vote to confirm Kavanaugh, I am okay with.
I think it is unlikely but I hope the conservative court will return the abortion matter to the states, where it belongs.
I would also like to see Planned Parenthood personnel charged with murder each and every time they perform an abortion after 23-24 weeks of gestation (the approximate date that an infant is viable to live outside the womb) (Planned Parenthood V Casey 1992)
My state (Louisiana) is one of the states who has a trigger law. If Roe V Wade is ever overturned, abortion will be banned.
that sounds reasonable to me.
abortion should, imho, be limited to extremely few cases (such as to save the life of the mother)
Kavanaugh can tell these people anything he things they want to hear so that’s he is confirmed. Just play the game.
Collins: “so you are OK with abortion?”
Kavanaugh: “sure ... the more the merrier (whatever bitch - just vote for me)
I hope that he votes to overturn Roe vs. Wade.
The life of each baby begins at conception.
Until Congress makes a law that grants the legal status of ‘person’ to unborn babies it is law.
Marriage was defined as a bond between a man and a woman in custom, belief, and law in the West for thousands of years until it wasn’t. Roe v. Wade is on life support as is gay marriage.
Lincoln had a few words to say about the “settled law” of Supreme Court decisions, when he spoke about Dredd Scott:
“If this important decision had been made by the unanimous concurrence of the judges, and without any apparent partisan bias, and in accordance with legal public expectation, and with the steady practice of the departments throughout our history, and had been in no part, based on assumed historical facts which are not really true; or, if wanting in some of these, it had been before the court more than once, and had there been affirmed and re-affirmed through a course of years, it then might be, perhaps would be, factious, nay, even revolutionary, to not acquiesce in it as a precedent.
But when, as it is true we find it wanting in all these claims to the public confidence, it is not resistance, it is not factious, it is not even disrespectful, to treat it as not having yet quite established a settled doctrine for the country...”
Roe was built on racism...Proposed as a way to keep the black population under control...
Marriage between a man and a woman was settled law for thousands of years before the SC said it wasn’t (two years after they said that marriage was a state issue, which made that settled law).
The Supremes are not going to hear any challenges to Roe until Ruth gets replaced. Probably one other leftist as well. It needs to be a 7-2 decision at least.
Settled law exists only in the exact words of our Constitution. All other laws are negotiable and frequently eliminated or created by the legislatures.
Since we have a legal system based on precedence law, law is never settled.
JoMa
oh you mean like slavery was settled law?
Libtard rino idiots.
Since Democrats recognize a legal system based on precedence law only when it agrees with their ideology, law is never settled.
If she’s “retired” it’s far more likely to be at the hands of a democrap that makes her look like Jesse Helms than by someone to her right.
It’s ok to tell the broad whatever she needs to hear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.