They can’t even say what the weather will be this weekend...
I WRITE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR A LIVING
I can write you a computer ‘simulation’ that gives you any result you want.
They then design a computer simulation, altering key factors to create a “counter-factual.”...
I.E. “Figures don’t Lie, but Liars Figure.”
Tails we win, heads we win.
Poll after poll shows the fictitious “climate change” myth doesn’t even register on the list of the concerns of most people. We have had the most miserable, stormy, humid summer I can remember and even liberals aren’t spouting the “climate change” stuff (at least with me).
there is an app for that too...
weather wannabe app.
Yes, it’s “just that simple”
And the “science” is “no longer in question”
And just in time for the Mid Terms from nbc “news” and ap
A simulation based on a guess.
We used to call it a SWAG...Scientific Wild Ass Guess.
How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
If they’ll smoke a few more joints, everything will be just fine....LOL
This people are stupid.
In related news:
NASA’s Opportunity Rover on Mars Still Silent 2 Months into Epic Dust Storm
https://www.space.com/41521-mars-dust-storm-opportunity-rover-still-silent.html
During last year’s eclipse they knew when and where the eclipse was going to occur long before the event because they truly understand the orbital properties.
When they can accurately and consistently tell me that there will be a Category x hurricane that will hit somewhere on some date, then I’d say they have real understanding.
Researchers. Sure.
These are the same retards who with billions of dollars worth of computers, satellites, and radar CAN NOT accurately predict the freaking weather five days from now, but swear up and down that their predictions on global warming 50 to 100 years from now are accurate.
attribution science is slightly more advanced science than divining rods and rain dances.
Physicist Howard Hayden's one-letter disproof of global warming claims [pre-Climategate]Dear Administrator Jackson:
I write in regard to the Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, Proposed Rule, 74 Fed. Reg. 18,886 (Apr. 24, 2009), the so-called "Endangerment Finding."
It has been often said that the "science is settled" on the issue of CO2 and climate. Let me put this claim to rest with a simple one-letter proof that it is false.
The letter is s, the one that changes model into models. If the science were settled, there would be precisely one model, and it would be in agreement with measurements.
Alternatively, one may ask which one of the twenty-some models settled the science so that all the rest could be discarded along with the research funds that have kept those models alive.
We can take this further. Not a single climate model predicted the current cooling phase. If the science were settled, the model (singular) would have predicted it.
(excerpted from Professor Hayden's letter to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator Environmental Protection Agency. More at link.)
Currently we are in a interglacial and are overdue for a return of the ice sheets. Large ice ages like the current Quaternary have smaller ice ages (called glacials) and warmer periods (called interglacials) within them. During the beginning of the Quaternary glaciation, from about 2.7 million to 1 million years ago, these cold glacial periods occurred every 41,000 years. However, during the last 800,000 years, huge glacial sheets have appeared less frequently — about every 100,000 years.
This is how the 100,000-year cycle works: Ice sheets grow for about 90,000 years and then take about 10,000 years to collapse during warmer periods. Then, the process repeats itself. We are due to soon enter a long period of ice sheet growth. Look at the chart below which details the Quaternary and how the glacial and interglacials are occurring with clockwork regularity.
Call me selfish but I sort of hope that the fiction of CO2 induced global warming is true and that it will push out the return of the next glacial.
I’m sure that the author of this ridiculous screed, James Rainey, couldn’t tell the difference between a cherry tree and an onion tree.