Posted on 08/14/2018 12:01:18 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
Yes, as far as the Anti American, Anti 2A Prog Leftists, Anti American MSM, Florida State Swamp and Entitled Negros goes.
There seems to be a divide elsewhere on the public right to assault and batter irritating busybodies whenever someone is so inclined.
The Jury will decide that, not you.
While I agree with your generalization, please do not include me in your "We".
I have never said Drejka is a good guy, I simply point out the difference between the Prog MSM character assassination narrative and what is entered into trial court as testimony under oath.
On the other hand, I do cite Conviction records because they are the result of trial court testimony under oath.
I have attempted to discuss Law and attempts to manipulate the Law into Injustice over emotions and "feelwings", but I will give as good as I get.
OK.
Enough generalizations.
Drejka is a jackass.
McGlockton was a jackass.
The girlfriend is a jackass.
One of them is dead.
One of them is on trial, rightly, for manslaughter.
One of them deserves a citation for illegal parking.
This is what happens when a critical mass of jackassery is assembled.
That is true, and I have seen it before.
However more Jackasses are involved than you list. to wit:
Prog DemoRat Socialist Jackasses
Anti 2A Jackasses
Anti YOUR 1A Jackasses
MSM American Enemy Jackasses
Florida State Swamp Jackasses
Entitled Negro Jackasses
Racist Anti White Jackasses
Anti Exceptional America Jackasses
It would be wise of us to prevent these Jackasses from making further gains from a manipulated Jackass Crisis even when there is no good guy.
It’s clear as day in the video.
The Jury will decide that, not you.
so true. common decorum has truly flown out the window and you better not trust ANYONE, particularly someone you say something too, blow the horn at, etc.
Well then you should practice what you preach.
After all you’re sitting there banging away at your keyboard with your holier than thou my way or the highway attitude saying that the shooter is innocent.
As a CCW the shooter should never go around trolling people so he can have reason in his mind to pull out the compensation for his obvious lack of manhood.
But no, the shooter appointed himself the parking space police because he was a Billy bad ass with a gun.
Yeah there were numerous complaints against him, just like another infamous Florida shooter where the system broke down and the police did nothing. Some of the complaints no charges were filed because they were afraid, or thought the guy was just nuts and didn’t want to bother.
No, I said the shooter is entitled to the Presumption of Innocence, By Law, until proven guilty.
Your statement is a deliberate and knowing misrepresentation of what I said, ie, a LIE, it is also entirely Projection.
Well then you should practice what you preach
I do, once an individual has had Due Process Under Law, I cite the result as fact, innocent or guilty, while you allude to the opposite and engage in Trial by Media, a Prog Socialist quality.
As a CCW the shooter should never go around trolling people so he can have reason in his mind to pull out the compensation for his obvious lack of manhood.
I have never remarked on, or considered this subject, nor do I care about your obvious interest in the shooters Manhood.
But no, the shooter appointed himself the parking space police ...
I have acknowledged that Drejka is an irritating busybody, what is the normal prison sentence for that?
... he was a Billy bad ass with a gun.
While I have not previously commented on this particular detail, Drejka did fire only one perfectly placed round after careful aim.
Yeah there were numerous complaints against him, just like another infamous Florida shooter where the system broke down and the police did nothing. Some of the complaints no charges were filed because they were afraid, or thought the guy was just nuts and didn’t want to bother.
Wild ranting like this, blaming the police and "system" when you are advocating Trial By Media and Mob Rule actions against an individual and advocating denial of Due Process Under Law says much more about you than the police or system, regardless of who "another infamous Florida shooter" might be.
I “lied”?
You and others claim that the shooter is some helpless little old man. In fact one of your cohorts on here claimed the shooter was 70.
So the ONLY liars on here are you and the very few others defending the freak.
“I have never remarked on, or considered this subject”
You never considered the fact that one of the responsibilities of having a CCW is you don’t go out looking for trouble?
“I have acknowledged that Drejka is an irritating busybody, what is the normal prison sentence for that?”
I never said prison for being a annoying busybody. But based on what has been reported about him, an immediate revocation of his CCW upon the first complaint would have been a start.
“did fire only one perfectly placed round after careful aim.”
If that’s the case, then it’s obvious based on the video that he was neither hurt nor was he in fear for his life.
It’s been proven time and time again that if you are hurt and or in fear for your life “Fight or Flight” turns into “Pray and Spray” and you are not going to have the “time” for a carefully aimed shot.
I have never claimed Drejka is "some helpless little old man", You Lie AGAIN Trooper, and I am not responsible for posts of "others".
In fact one of your cohorts on here claimed the shooter was 70.
You LIE AGAIN Trooper, I have no "cohorts", and I am not responsible for posts of other FReepers.
“I have never remarked on, or considered this subject”
Yep, and the subject was your intense interest in Drejks' "Manhood", wich you examine very closely.
... based on what has been reported about him, an immediate revocation of his CCW upon the first complaint would have been a start.
You should discuss that with the Sheriff, you can use the McGlockton method of getting his attention, we would all understand.
... it’s obvious based on the video that he was neither hurt nor was he in fear for his life.
The Jury will decide that, not you.
It’s been proven time and time again that if you are hurt and or in fear for your life “Fight or Flight” turns into “Pray and Spray” and you are not going to have the “time” for a carefully aimed shot.
YOU LIE AGAIN Trooper, and this time it's about the entire class of CCW holders and their performance in incidents where they use their weapon in defense.
On the whole, CCW holders are significantly less likely to injure or kill an innocent bystander than trained police officers.
Your Pray and Spray is most often used by your Drive By Gang Banging friends you apologize for.
You’re delusional.
I missed your reply somehow back during the discussion, but, if I’m reading your post correctly, you seem to be criticizing me but then making the same point I made. The stand you ground statute is a different statute than self defense. You do realize that “stand your ground” is the actual language used in the statute?
776.012;Use or threatened use of force in defense of person.—
(1);A person is justified in using or threatening to use force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. A person who uses or threatens to use force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat before using or threatening to use such force.
(2);A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.