Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archivist rejects Democrats' demand for Kavanaugh documents
The Hill ^ | 08/13/18 | Jordain Carney

Posted on 08/13/2018 10:01:04 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

The National Archives is doubling down on its refusal to respond to Democratic' requests for documents from Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's White House tenure.

Archivist David Ferriero wrote in a letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, that it is the agency's policy to only respond to requests from a committee chairman, who are all Republicans.

"Accordingly, I am not in a position to change our understanding of the law or our practice in this particular instance," Ferriero said.

Feinstein sent a letter to Ferriero last week asking him to reconsider the Archives decision not to request to Democratic-only request for Kavanaugh's documents. But she faced an uphill fight after Ferriero rebuffed a similar request for Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.).

Ferriero noted to Feinstein that had consulted with his general counsel as well as the Department of Justice, which had confirmed their interpretation of the Presidential Records Act (PRA) and supported the Archives "longtanding and consistent practice of responding only to requests from committee chairs."

Ferriero's denial of Feinstein comes as Republicans are pressing ahead with Kavanaugh's nomination.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) announced on Friday that the Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on Kavanaugh's nomination starting on Sept. 4. The hearing, he said, would last three or four days.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) indicated that the timeline will put senators on track to have a floor vote on Kavanaugh's nomination before the Supreme Court starts its next term in October.

The timeline means that a confirmation vote on Kavanaugh is likely before the National Archives is able to fulfill Grassley’s request for documents from Kavanaugh’s time as a White House lawyer.

The agency wrote to Grassley that it wouldn’t be able to complete the request, which it expects will total more than 900,000 pages, until late October. The documents would still need to go through a final review before being turned over to the committee.

But Republicans have pledged to move his nomination anyways, arguing that a legal team for President George W. Bush is reviewing the same documents and will be able to hand over the documents at a faster pace.

The Bush legal team cleared a second tranche of documents—totaling roughly 88,000 pages—from Kavanaugh's time as a White House lawyer for public release on Sunday. Democrats have fumed over the GOP tactics, arguing Republicans are trying to cherry pick what parts of Kavanaugh's records get released publicly.

They want the National Archives to hand over documents from Kavanaugh's work as a staff secretary for the Bush White House, arguing it would shed light on his legal thinking on controversial issues like torture or surveillance.

Republicans have refused to request the paperwork, accusing Democrats of going on a "fishing expedition" that could slow-walk Kavanaugh's nomination. Because Democrats are in the minority, they are powerless to force the Archives to hand over Kavanaugh's staff secretary work.

Senate Judiciary Democrats, in a hail-mary move, filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests last week for Kavanaugh's paperwork, including documents from the three-year period he was staff secretary.

The National Archives is giving the request, spearheaded by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), an expedited review process as it decides what, if any, documents to hand over.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 115th; democrats; kavanaugh; nara; obstructionistdems

1 posted on 08/13/2018 10:01:04 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Apparently elections have consequences. :)


2 posted on 08/13/2018 10:02:58 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Hey, Di Fi—maybe your Chinese driver can get some info for you . . .


3 posted on 08/13/2018 10:06:08 AM PDT by Charlemagne on the Fox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Wow, that absolute traitorous, piece of human refuse is on the Judiciary Committee AND the Intelligence Committee?

Unbelievable. Well, her giving judiciary committee data to her buddies in Red China probably won’t harm national security that much.

I guess.


4 posted on 08/13/2018 10:07:03 AM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Ferreiro knows how to handle nuts. (Dip them in chocolate?)


5 posted on 08/13/2018 10:09:00 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The filthy bastards are looking anything they can change with the media’s help into something that will get him rejected.


6 posted on 08/13/2018 10:20:18 AM PDT by I want the USA back (If free speech is taken away, dumb and silent we are led, like sheep to the slaughter: G Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The National Archives should always try to accommodate the requests of members of Congress, even if it is just a request unlikely to yield useful or relevant information.

Someday Republicans might find themselves in the minority and unable to obtain information they need.


7 posted on 08/13/2018 10:23:55 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Only traitorous RINOs could cause him to be rejected.


8 posted on 08/13/2018 10:25:12 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

We have to confirm Kavanaugh to find out what he’s about.

Turnabout’s fair play, dems.


9 posted on 08/13/2018 10:35:52 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Liberals, piss off. That is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

It’s my understanding this has been the policy.

The Repubs went along with the almost 1 million page request but the Dems want an additional 3 million, that’s not on ridiculous it’s unreasonable.


10 posted on 08/13/2018 10:41:26 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
I'm waiting for the requisite bimbo eruption from the left. I wonder how many they will proffer this time?
11 posted on 08/13/2018 10:42:20 AM PDT by Know et al ( Keep on Freepin'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

on = only


12 posted on 08/13/2018 10:42:54 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Anyone with half a brain cell (which leaves out almost all Dems) can see that this is nothing but a delay tactic by the Dems in hopes their fortunes in the mid terms will change the status quo in their favor and to keep their vulnerable Senators from having to take a vote before those mid terms. The Dems are going to vote no anyway, so they don’t need all those documents.


13 posted on 08/13/2018 1:54:50 PM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson