Replies

I don’t know you and you sure talk big but you’re right

A well meaning minority can indeed be a nationalist but few are

The last redoubt for a traditional constitution loving America is more than anyone White People and it would be nice to convince others but per voting patterns it’s not encouraging

Same exact thing where whites live worldwide

They are clinging to their birthrights fought for by the blood of their ancestry currently being usurped by a Camp of The Saints scenario much faster than anyone ever thought possible and abetted by white kapo cucks

The fact you or I don’t like the term white nationalist is beside the point

The facts are what they are. It doesn’t mean we don’t welcome none white fellow travelers or Jews who also tend to be on the other side.

But it’s no question Trump folks are trying to roll back a largely minority demographic balloon fueled cultural and societal revolution ...without open borders past 50 years this would not have happened

I would imagine nationwide very quickly that 55-62% white vote for the GOP or Trump in nationwide elections will become 70%

The quicker the better cause we win thst way

But you feel free to call it whatever you want

I’m not beholden to trying to not rile our enemies

They will demonize us even if we had a black right wing president and would be calling him black Hitler

The term white nationalist first came to my attention back in early to mid 2000s here when the powers banned vdare and amren as white nationalism sites

It’s not just the left

NeoCons

National Review

Jonah Goldberg

Dinesh D’Souza

Ben Shapiro

Use that term as a weapon against the alt right and Trump folks in Shapiro and Goldbergs case

Whites are under attack

If you fail to see that then you’re the one falling for something

I’ve known Mike Tubbs for nearly 30 years I assume he’s in Charlottesville as he was last year spoiling for a fight

He’s a devoted Turner Diaries sort....very smart amd very dangerous

I diverged with him early on but I was fond of him admittedly

This has been his life

Spencer I think is a plant

A nation is a specific people. It is no insult to those peoples--the vast array of other peoples--who are not part of any particular nation. None, whatsoever. Generally--but clearly extendable by adoption as in the case of many loyal Americans of today; a nation have common lines of descent, common histories, and common values--all providing the bases for an ongoing sense of purpose in a common identity .

I could dig up quotes from Vattel, which spell this out better than I can, but surely you all get the idea. The Preamble to the Constitution clearly identifies a purpose to secure its benefits for the posterity of its adherents.

The term "White Nationalists" tends to cause confusion--however sincere some who use it may be. The Caucasian race--not all of whom have the White skin, typical of American Caucasians--comprises many nations. While many of these make compatible immigrants, they do not inevitably do so. To promote an adequate vetting of potential entrants into American communities, you do not meet that need by confusing a primary race with the specific ethos of a particular nation. Nor is it necessary to ignore the loyalty of minority citizens, who are in fact loyal to the political compact that governs the physical domains of the particular nation. (All "minorities" are not enemies of the settler culture that is inherent in the Constitutional purpose.)

Charlottesville is a city that has a great hold on my affections. The original Jeffersonian campus, at the University he founded and carefully planned, exudes a spiritual aura to me, which is difficult to describe in words; so, too, does the room, there, where America's greatest writer, Edgar Allan Poe, lived while a student there. The fact that someone ordered Police to stand-down, while Antifa thugs rioted in the vicinity of this shrine seems almost incomprehensible.

wardaddy: "The last redoubt for a traditional constitution loving America is more than anyone White People and it would be nice to convince others but per voting patterns it’s not encouraging."

Hardly, many "White People" don't give a d*mn about the Constitution, including majorities of some sub-groups, women & academics come to mind, and average working people are less concerned about constitutional niceties than about defending their jobs, communities & families.
Yes, they love Trump, but not because of his opinions on the Constitution.

At the same time plenty who are not from Northern European ancestry also love the Constitution and our nation.
Names like Scalia, Thomas, Cruz, Levin & D'Souza come to mind, though admittedly minorities in their own communities.
Still, we hear rumors of remarkable changes among African-Americans suggesting the real missing ingredient in many minorities is simply leadership -- they need strong voices defending what it means to be American.

Point is: "White Nationalism" is a ludicrous term, both indefinable and already co-opted by the Left as a pejorative.
Indeed the very definition of "conservative" and "Republican" includes "color-blind" and there's no good reason to change that.

wardaddy: "The fact you or I don’t like the term white nationalist is beside the point."

What's not "beside the point" is that the term "White Nationalism" is ludicrous and counter-productive.
There's no good reason to ever use it and plenty of reasons to stay well away from it.