“He said the government needs to prove that it has considered the benefits to society of having illegal immigrants here and working, versus the government’s interest in enforcing the laws as written.”
Astonishing, coming from a judge.
What part of “illegal” does the judge not understand?
So if I go rob a grocery store and steal all the food, because I think it is a good idea to pass out the food to “the hungry”, then the grocery store owner has to prove that this was not a good idea on my part, to help these hungry people, right?
Is this a fair analogy?
This just disgusts me that a judge is so uppity as to think he gets to make the law instead of upholding the law.
That is grounds for impeaching this judge.
Judge Bates just vetoed a law the President swore to uphold.
IOW, PDJT must think like a SJW. The law be damned. Of course, congress will be all over this clown judge who ordered PDJT to ignore the law. /s.
I chuckle when the occasional freeper insists we still have a republic.
That sounds like the judge's personal opinion and not in any applicable statute. In other words, more judicial tyranny. I guess the supremes will have to weigh in on this. What a gridlock we live in.
UNBELIEVABLE!
If the judge admitted that the President et al had the power to abolish the DACA program, then he no longer had any right/power to tell them how to do it.
This judge should be brought up on charges of unprofessional and unethical conduct, and anything else that fits the crime.
Invalidates his opinion and Authority