then they should have NO RIGHT to pawn themselves off as women!!!If some faggot makes a pass at you it’s funny
Same as when a woman does it
If you react violently
You are a fag too.
What’s next????
Half way through sex “I have ( insert lifetime curse STD here) “
STD Panic...????
Two Democrat lawmakers. And the Bolsheviks at The Hill run with it.
How about gay rape?
then they should have NO RIGHT to pawn themselves off as women!!!So #MeToo is not a defense when a sexual predator grabs your crotch or exposes himself in a public washroom???
Anything sponsored by Dummycrats is pure garbage, and just by the explanation that ass munchers have more power to make up their own stories is utter nonsense.
Someone explain to the faggots they can bake a cake..
Well that defense sounds like a real problem. /s
Any examples of this "panic" defense working? Bueller? Bueller? Mueller?
This “law” will allow homosexuals to rape children. That’s what this is about.
Children will not be able to say NO to homosexual molestation.
We definitely need special protection for Homosexual Predators.
How about gays who end up murdering their partners through weird S & M sexual behaviors?
Isn’t that regarded as violent crimes against gay or transgender people? It seems the law looks the other way on that one as accidental death.
Another law in search of a problem.
They can cite one failed and obviously ridiculous attempt to use the described defense.
I don’t think this will pass the “constitutionality” test.
However ridiculous one’s defensive measures in court, it’s up to the jury whether or not it is valid, not congress.
Corporal Klinger defense I guess. This will become a license in your face pervert behavior.
“The Gay and Trans Panic Defense Prohibition Act of 2018 was introduced in the Senate by Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and in the House by Rep. Joe Kennedy (D-Mass.).”
Why am I not surprised? Malarky and Kennedy! Someone do the country a favor and put saltpeter in the Kennedy Clan’s meals.
Democrat just love perverts
It should be left to juries, not the law, as to what is believable about a defendant’s line of defense. The stupid law should be renamed the “Legal Chains on Juries” law.