Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peter Strzok Reveals FBI Debated Russia Collusion Probe Based on Trump’s Poll Numbers
Breitbart ^ | 13 Jul 2018 | Aaron Klein

Posted on 07/14/2018 4:39:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

NEW YORK — In statements largely unreported by the news media, FBI official Peter Strzok described an alleged debate that took place within the FBI about how aggressively to pursue the Russia collusion investigation based on Donald Trump’s poll numbers in the 2016 presidential election. Strzok made his statements about nine hours into Thursday’s televised congressional hearing during a section in which he was explaining his infamous August 2016 text message referencing an “insurance policy” in the event that Trump wins the election.

“The insurance policy text that has come up before?” began Strzok. “That text represented a debate on information that we had received from an extraordinarily sensitive source and method and that typically when something is that sensitive if you take action on it you put it at risk. And so there is a tension there. Maybe we should just roll slow. Take a typical 3, 4-year counterintelligence investigation because the more aggressive you are the more you put it at risk. And some people said that.”

Strzok went on to claim that Trump’s poll numbers played a role in internal FBI conversations about the speed of the investigation, with he himself arguing for an aggressive investigation when others were advocating for less aggressive tactics.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 201608
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2018 4:39:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Peter Strzok shouldn’t be IN prison; he should be UNDER the prison!


2 posted on 07/14/2018 4:41:04 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Swear to God these bastards need hangin’ !


3 posted on 07/14/2018 4:41:11 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So basically he said. “It looks like, based on the poll numbers that Trump isn’t going to win, so we won’t be needing the “insurance policy”. He just flatly admitted right then that they were only investigating in order to keep Trump from being president, not for getting to the truth.


5 posted on 07/14/2018 4:54:40 PM PDT by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

pompous little squirt with a smug smirk! wish I knew how to show the face of of lady justice with her blind-fold replaced with his face. Is this our Justice Department? Must be demoralizing for the honest, hard-working men and women.


6 posted on 07/14/2018 5:09:04 PM PDT by Nanny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry

Oh wow, what a political policeman this Peter is.


7 posted on 07/14/2018 5:20:52 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nanny7

When the Communists listed it as a desideratum to discredit the FBI, maybe stunts like this would be how. Peter knows he’s going down sooner or later but he’s taking it for the loyal team.


8 posted on 07/14/2018 5:22:20 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Where are Bill Priestap and Admiral Rodgers?


9 posted on 07/14/2018 5:45:20 PM PDT by Az Joe (I AM TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Strzok has done a superb job of implicating his superiors
1) He failed (in his words, had an “out of range”) polygraph, but was NOT removed from security clearance on sensitive info, despite that being a firm rule of DOJ.

2) He failed to tell his superiors about his adulterous relationship with Lisa Page, a firing offense according to written policy.

3) He wrote the “exoneration” memo on his own computer, which no one else had access to, and which shows a failure to abide by rules of evidence, and which memo Comey used. This self-evident corruption bothered none of his superiors.

4) He admits his superiors knew Hillary's emails were going to a foreign, non-Russian entity (hacked), but did nothing about it.

5) He admits Bruce Ohr passed information (the dossier) from Fusion GPS to the FBI. FBI knew it was dirty but used it in the FISA application.

He made sure he doesn't go down alone.

10 posted on 07/14/2018 5:51:18 PM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“... an extraordinarily sensitive source and method...”

I call bullsheist. We’re not talking the KGB and nuclear secrets here.


11 posted on 07/14/2018 6:30:15 PM PDT by A strike (Natural events are just God moving His stuff around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
That text represented a debate on information that we had received from an extraordinarily sensitive source and method

Yea, Obama told him personally that in case the FBI fails he also has the IRS, CIA and NSA working on alternate plans.

12 posted on 07/14/2018 6:34:00 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Oh so all these leftists investigating Russian collusion for Mueller are taking the slow track to finding some crime.

But they had to take out all the folks who opposed the Iran deal. They took flynn out fast. And some others I don’t recall because I just don’t keep up with who is who and what is what.


13 posted on 07/14/2018 6:39:45 PM PDT by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I did wonder if he could be the thread to begin the unraveling of the whole affair. Thought at the time that’s why the FBI were propping him up. That’s why he’s smug; they have to take care of him because he knows so much, and there’s so much more to know! Sure hope you’re right.


14 posted on 07/14/2018 6:52:11 PM PDT by Nanny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry; LS

“In the unlikely event” that Trump won the electoral vote. I don’t know what extra sensitive information they had? No poll was predicting a Trump win except maybe one that LS followed.

This guy must have rehearsed his answers over and over.

Anyone notice what was going on behind his ear during the intermission when he was chatting with his attorney. Take a close look. Very interesting.


15 posted on 07/14/2018 7:06:45 PM PDT by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine and education.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run

When you do FBI counterintel, you know where a lot of bodies are buried. Getting rid of Strzok will not be easy.


16 posted on 07/14/2018 7:44:09 PM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

Very frightening to realize how corrupt our government is.


17 posted on 07/14/2018 7:49:12 PM PDT by abbastanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So far the identified or suspected “confidential sources” have been Russians (some of whom were definitely SRV/GRU assets), a suspect British ex-intel officer (and his Russian sources), the leftist Fusion GPS and Mrs. Ohr, the Democratic National Committee, the Clinton campaign, Halper?, Mifsud (don’t know whose side he is on), other bit-players, and most likely Soviet/Russian KGB/SRV/GRU officers themselves in various roles of deception.

If there was an FBI or CIA mole inside the Trump campaign, his testimony would probably NOT be allowed in court for a number of reasons (including illegal search and seizure), official Govt misconduct by the FBI, CIA, DNI, and NSA, for a start.

We have got to remember that a significant number of key US judges are politically corrupt, stupid, biased, or incompetent, all of which favor the Democrats of like positions.

With Weissman’s background in withholding exculpatory evidence in a number of major federal crimes, any case he brings could be thrown out because of official misconduct and bias.

We will just have to wait and see.

I suspect our side has some aces up their sleeves and will throw them down at the right time to destroy any credibility Mueller and his merry band of leftists and hacks.

I can smell something good in the wind.


18 posted on 07/14/2018 9:15:10 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Deep State operatives feel invulnerable...and blatantly act invulnerable. Rosenstein, Mueller, this freak here. I guess unless something actually happens - outside of just losing their gig (Hell their patrons can keep them flush, job or no job) - to cause them to act differently, what else can be expected?


19 posted on 07/14/2018 9:22:33 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abbastanza

“Very frightening to realize how corrupt our government is.”

Sobering. The people lost complete control of their government, and never had an idea...until now.


20 posted on 07/14/2018 9:27:04 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson