Skip to comments.
DHS Refuses to ‘Reunite’ Children with Adults Who Aren’t Their Parents
https://www.breitbart.com/ ^
| 10 Jul 2018
| IAN MASON
Posted on 07/11/2018 1:35:44 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) held a joint call Tuesday to announce their efforts to comply with a June 26 federal court ruling mandating children under five years old in HHS custody be reunited with parents if they were separated at the border. U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, in response to an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) lawsuit, set a July 10 deadline to reunite the families and refused to provide additional time for the government to use DNA testing to determine if the people in question are even the 102 identified childrens parents.
Nevertheless, the government, in its Tuesday Joint Status Report notes that in at least 14 of the 102 childrens cases, they will not be reuniting them with parents because the adults in question are either not actually their parents, have been convicted of serious crimes, including rape and murder, or have been credibly accused of child abuse. The government will not place children with adults without completing these checks.
Let me be clear: HHS could have transferred every child out of our care to a parent who is currently in DHS custody today if we did not take into account child safety or whether the adult is actually the parent, HHS Chief of Staff Chris Meekins, told reporters.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Florida; US: New Mexico; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2018election; 2020election; aclu; aliens; arizona; buildthefence; california; children; daca; danasabraw; dhs; dreamact; dreamers; election2018; election2020; florida; illegalaliens; immigration; mexico; migrants; newmexico; newyork; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Damned if they do damned if they don't !
Build the dam wall already and close the door !
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Damned if they do damned if they don't ! In such cases, do what's right and let the chips fall where they may. Here that means not giving kids to adults who are known to not be their parents and who may have been kidnapping or abusing them.
2
posted on
07/11/2018 1:39:08 PM PDT
by
pepsi_junkie
(Russians couldnt have done a better job destroying sacred American institutions than Democrats have)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
“The government will not place children with adults without completing these checks.”
Exactly. Now STFU ACLU.
To: beergarden; pepsi_junkie
4
posted on
07/11/2018 1:41:34 PM PDT
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(;I'm not a psychopath, I'm a high-functioning sociopath. Do your research.” Sherlock Holmes)
To: pepsi_junkie; ATOMIC_PUNK
U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, in response to an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) lawsuit, set a July 10 deadline to reunite the families and refused to provide additional time for the government to use DNA testing to determine if the people in question are even the 102 identified childrens parents. We have a political issue at stake here!
WE dont have time to worry about the safety of children!
Now get it done!
5
posted on
07/11/2018 1:52:21 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, in response to an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) lawsuit, set a July 10 deadline to reunite the families and refused to provide additional time for the government to use DNA testing to determine if the people in question are even the 102 identified childrens parents.To paraphrase Andrew Jackson, "Dana Sabraw has made his decision: now let him enforce it!"
6
posted on
07/11/2018 1:54:18 PM PDT
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(For 'tis the sport to have the engineer hoist with his own petard., -- Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 4)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Someone
PLEASE explain this to me.
- Some criminal amigo is cooling his heels in jail.
- Some judge orders children to be reunited with their parents.
- Mister Amigo is released from jail.
- Kid is reunited with Mister Amigo.
Does that apply to Americans in jails in prisons too? I mean, if you have kids then you get out of jail free?
7
posted on
07/11/2018 2:02:17 PM PDT
by
Governor Dinwiddie
(MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
#6: To paraphrase Andrew Jackson,
"Dana Sabraw has made his decision: now let him enforce it!" This ball is in President Trump's court. Is this another ploy to entrap President Trump? Were it not for the leftist news networks, "antifa", Maxine, Schmucky, and the rest of the circus, I'm sure President Trump would just ignore the judge.
8
posted on
07/11/2018 2:09:10 PM PDT
by
Governor Dinwiddie
(MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
How dare DHS stop the flow of child trafficking!!
9
posted on
07/11/2018 2:21:10 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
(Not my circus, not my monkeys)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
So why does the AMERICAN Civil Liberties Union protect the “rights” of other country’s children? They have ZERO constitutional rights. Wouldn’t it be truly amazing if the ACLU protected American children?
10
posted on
07/11/2018 2:43:53 PM PDT
by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
In other words, the Trump administration refuses to give children to human slave traders and pedophile sex traffickers who claim to be parents when the DNA does not match.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Given this group of 102 children is a random sample, if 5% of the children were brought by persons not their parents, and 8% were brought by persons wanted for child abuse or criminal charges, that means an average of 13% of crossing children on any given day are at imminent risk and we have even more reason to control who comes across our border. And to ensure that these at risk children are returned to the custody of their home governments.
In the meantime, we've got the ACLU whining that DNA testing is an invasion of privacy and a threat to family unity and a federal judge trying to limit DNA testing as a ‘last resort’ but refusing to extend the time minors are housed to allow for verification of paper documentation with foreign consulates.
12
posted on
07/11/2018 3:29:50 PM PDT
by
blueplum
( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
13
posted on
07/11/2018 3:32:56 PM PDT
by
4Liberty
(illegal immigration is a "process" crime too....)
To: shanover
So why does the AMERICAN Civil Liberties Union protect the rights of other countrys children? They have ZERO constitutional rights. Wouldnt it be truly amazing if the ACLU protected American children? Wait a minute! You mean "ACLU" stands for "American Civil Liberties Union"?
And all this time I thought it stood for "American Criminal Liberties Union".
Learn something new every day, I tells ya!
14
posted on
07/11/2018 3:34:17 PM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Marxism: Wonderful theory, wrong species)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Close the door and weld it shut!
15
posted on
07/11/2018 3:51:12 PM PDT
by
Zathras
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Let me be clear: HHS could have transferred every child out of our care to a parent who is currently in DHS custody today if we did not take into account child safety or whether the adult is actually the parent, HHS Chief of Staff Chris Meekins, told reporters.
Fascism! Racism! Homophobia! Kitchen sink of epithets!!!!!!!! Common sense!/s
16
posted on
07/11/2018 3:57:48 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Ignore this idiot judge the way Democrats ignore subpoenas from Congress. Tell her to go to hell and call out her own army.
17
posted on
07/11/2018 4:06:54 PM PDT
by
Luke21
(The Hill sucks.)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
DHS Refuses to Reunite Children with Adults Who Arent Their Parents
DNC pedophiles deeply saddened.
18
posted on
07/11/2018 4:17:24 PM PDT
by
lapsus calami
(What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
To: forgotten man
And the ACLU seems to be operating in an opposite manner. They need to be sued out of existence.
19
posted on
07/11/2018 4:53:20 PM PDT
by
oldtech
To: beergarden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson