Ping.
...“in its current form, it will not be compatible with” any nation’s commitment in the Paris agreement...
Let’s just build stuff with wood, hay, stubble, mud bricks and corrugated steel.
Good Lord. The want us to live like we did back in the stone age.
Why isn’t there a methane disclosure project? How about sulfur?
Why is it that a nominally negligible greenhouse gas like CO2 is so massively targetted, but real greenhouse gases and pollutants are considered so boring and hands-off by activists?
Translation: Shakedown.
We’re going to start with this sh!t again. Why don’t we just halt civilization.
Someone in that group should have told Sara to put her thumb back in her mouth and get back to playing with her legos.
Hilarious… I remember years ago musing to a bunch of guys over a beer that we can all await the day when the envirowackos would be coming after cement. It’s taken a while but here they are. Well, I don’t think that cement producers need much help in formulating their arguments against this manufactured problem but it goes without saying that for every negative, there is positive… in fact many, especially when looking at all the alternatives.
Haveth we any commitment to the Paris accord?
To set the record straight, it is portland cement that binds the sand and aggregate in concrete. Concrete is nown to presstitutes as cement
A key ingredient in concrete is Fly Ash which is a byproduct from burning coal in coal fired power plants. The concrete industry has yet to find a suitable replacement for it.
Of all the things that require permits, why are these types of organizations able to grow up out of nowhere and control aspects of industry like this?
Isn’t this a pseudo government type of effort. Who licenses them?
If there is a licensing process, someone needs to yank these people’s license.
This is total B.S., and it’s is very destructive.
I cordially invite the idiot to come up with a better binding agent.
This shows the complete and utter lack of critical thinking that befalls anyone who writes about climate change. Did this writer turn off his or her brain completely before typing that last sentence?
If cement accounts for 1/3 of all carbon emissions and it's less than steel, then that means that cement and steel alone account for at least 2/3 of all emissions, which would mean that everything else in the whole world put together (oil, coal, natural gas ... all energy) would be less than 1/3rd. OR the author thinks that all the various sources of carbon emissions add up to some number much greater than 100%.
These people need to be thrown into a deeply excavated footing and covered with a LOT of concrete.
Let’s just see how Social Justice Sarah enjoys living with a primitive and unsound infrastructure.
ARE WE STUCK WITH CEMENT?
What do you call 10,000 “environmentalists” up to their necks in concrete?
A good start.