Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Trump’s North Korea diplomacy, China is the loser
The Globe and Mail ^ | June 21, 2018 | Brahma Chellaney, Special to the Globe and Mail

Posted on 06/21/2018 2:22:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

North Korean strongman Kim Jong-un’s latest visit to Beijing this week cannot obscure the fact that China, once the primary conduit between Washington and Pyongyang, is at risk of being largely left on the outside. The White House has eroded China’s leverage by establishing a direct telephone link — a virtual hotline — to Mr. Kim.

In fact, U.S. President Donald Trump, by directly engaging Pyongyang over a nuclear and peace deal, has effectively cut out the middleman, China.

Beijing, which values North Korea as a strategic buffer against the U.S. military presence in South Korea, has reason to be suspicious of Mr. Kim’s overtures to the United States and the Trump administration’s direct dealings with Pyongyang. At the centre of Mr. Trump’s North Korea diplomacy is an effort to marginalize China’s regional role.

North Korea is China’s only formal military ally. A 1961 friendship treaty obligates China and North Korea to aid each other if attacked. But bilateral relations have soured since Mr. Kim assumed power in late 2011, and Chinese analysts criticized the pact as outdated.

Today, Beijing fears being sidelined in its own strategic backyard. It is apprehensive that, just as it turned against the Soviet Union after the its historic “opening” of relations with the United States under Richard Nixon in the early 1970s, its estranged ally, North Korea, could similarly switch allegiances. Mr. Kim, however, seems more interested in achieving a limited goal − rebalancing his foreign policy by mending fences with the United States so as to lessen North Korea’s economic and security reliance on its historical rival, China....

(Excerpt) Read more at theglobeandmail.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: china; japan; korea; maga; pyongyang; republicofkorea; russia; trump
I thought Drumpf was an idiot who couldn't figure things like this out by himself? I sure wish they'd make up their minds.

*********

Brahma Chellaney is a geostrategist and the author of nine books, including the award-winning Water: Asia’s New Battleground.

1 posted on 06/21/2018 2:22:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

China stands to gain a docile neighbor and a good trading partner, as the North Korean economy ramps up.

China couldn’t have been real thrilled with nukes on it’s border, and a guy who didn’t seem to be all that stable, controlling them.

If North Korea becomes a good trading partner with China and the rest of the planet, it would probably downsize it’s military as we telegraph we’ll downsize our presence in the South.

Seems to me like a situation where everyone stands to gain.

In the early days of North Korea upgrading it’s infrastructure, China could see a lot of commerce with the nation.


2 posted on 06/21/2018 2:31:30 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

We could withdraw our forces tomorrow. The South Korean Army was strong enough to resist invasion when I was there under Carter and Reagan. Our troops are merely a tripwire to get us into the fight. They haven’t been needed for DMZ defense for a long time and don’t serve in that capacity now.


3 posted on 06/21/2018 2:37:46 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Who fought in the Korean War?

Only North Koreans?

This was to let China know, it wasn’t going to win helping the North.


4 posted on 06/21/2018 2:46:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The most important thing for China is that the Koreas are not united. That’s what they really feared.


5 posted on 06/21/2018 2:53:01 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

China stands to benefit by not having a crazy nuclear power next to it.


6 posted on 06/21/2018 2:55:59 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

China stands to benefit by not having a crazy nuclear power next to it.


7 posted on 06/21/2018 2:55:59 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

BS article.


8 posted on 06/21/2018 3:25:43 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I agree. The idea that China needs NK as a “buffer” against the US military is laughable. We have hundreds of billions of dollars in trade with them, much to their advantage. They may wish we were gone so they could have complete military hegemony in the region, but they know damned well we aren’t going to attack them with 30,000 troops. But we might attack NK if they keep their nukes, though that seems unlikely now. So it’s a win for them too.


9 posted on 06/21/2018 3:58:06 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

I agree with your points there. Thanks for the response.


10 posted on 06/21/2018 4:32:48 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I would be happier if the current *South* Korean govt was right-minded and pro-American, but they’re not. Also, Putin is making sure Russia stays involved.


11 posted on 06/21/2018 5:56:47 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Maybe...I’d be more optimistic about everybody having something to gain if the leadership of NK’s neighbore like China/Russia were different and less anti-American...but the future bodes well certainly.


12 posted on 06/21/2018 6:00:33 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I think the article is referring to the short term (trade war) etc...China was using North Korea as leverage...


13 posted on 06/21/2018 6:03:00 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson