Enforce Immigration Law or Change It (Attractive Nuisance)

National Review ^ | 06/21/2018 | KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON

[Kid Shelleen]

The United States maintains a policy of separating children from their parents in the case of illegal border crossings in the same sense that the United States has a policy of separating parents from their children when those parents are sent to prison for murder or tax evasion or are jailed for unpaid speeding tickets

--SNIP-- The more illegals there were in the United States, the easier it was for more to come. It’s the public-policy version of what the tort lawyers call an “attractive nuisance.”

[Olog-hai]

So what impetus would exist to enforce a changed law versus the one in place?

[TBP]

Correct. If you don’t like the law, change it.

[Cecily]

Build an effective wall ASAP and 99% of the illegal invader problem will be solved. They and their issues (drugs, trafficking, crime, disease) aren’t our problem to solve and pay for if they can’t get in.

[Beowulf9]

Build that wall!!!

[Altura Ct.]

Enforce Immigration Law

THAT is what most on the right have been asking for years...

[elbook]

change it how ?

Allow anyone who wants to come here to do so ?

Special ‘Liberal Tax’ (quadrupling taxes ahead of the need on our caring friends) would quickly nix that.

Forcing libtards to “PUT THEIR MONEY WHERE THEY MOUTHS ARE “ quickly can demonstrate what little belief there is in those people for that good solution.

The Libtard Housing Directive requiring ‘new citizens’ to be housed in democrat/socialist voters house/homes/apartments and immediate REDISTRIBUTION OF THEIR WEALTH of such ‘believers’ to assist our new fellow citizens .....

Yeah thought so - few care THAT MUCH.

LIBTARDS LOVE SOLUTIONS WHERE SOMEONE ELSE PAYS FOR THEIR “FEELING GOOD ABOUT THEMSELVES”