Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/19/2018 5:34:51 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
David Inouye is an accidental climate scientist.

I didn't get very far before I had to quit reading this drivel....

32 posted on 06/19/2018 6:32:18 AM PDT by Tenacious 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Maryland to Colorado is some commute for a second job.


33 posted on 06/19/2018 6:33:31 AM PDT by o-n-money (We should rename California to Newer Mexico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Yes, and love is in the air.


35 posted on 06/19/2018 6:38:58 AM PDT by jimfree (My17 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
In the 1850s, Thoreau charted when Walden Pond's highbush blueberry first flowered. At the time, it happened around May 16, on average. In the past 10 years, it's averaged April 23. Primack started tracking blueberries there in the 2000s, so he can't specifically say how much of the earlier blooming was due to warming temperatures in the last 30 years, but he figures about a third of it is.

OR after more than 100 years, nature favored plants that bloomed earlier.

36 posted on 06/19/2018 6:41:02 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
It would help climate alarmists to go back and re-study basic data analysis, and to review the textbook section on correlation vs. causation. It would also help if they actually applied their scientific knowledge instead of using it to generate propaganda.

One would hope a professor of biology would understand that many factors influence plant and animal behavior, and that there are short and long term cycles in plant and animal populations. And I would hope a person who claims to be a scientist would rigorously test their theories against reality.

How realistic is it to believe that a blueberry plant in Massachusetts reacts to a temperature at any other location than its immediate vicinity? Or perhaps at most the region that affects the pollinating insects it depends on. So if the blueberry plants at Walden pond are being affected by a change in temperature, the first question is what has changed in the micro-environment they live in?

The answer to that is probably related to the paved parking lot across the street, or maybe even the large cleared field with a solar power array right across route 126 from the pond.

Real data on blueberry maturation dates has been published by the Blue Hill Observatory, also in Massachusetts. That data shows how the maturation date varies widely on a year by year basis, and to the extent a correlation can be extracted reliably from that data, and the related temperature data, the rate of increase in temperature and the date of blueberry maturation aren't correlated.

As the Blue Hill Observatory data shows, the rate of temperature increase at the observatory is roughly the same since 1890 using the 30 year average. Blueberry maturation dates remained roughly the same through the 1970s, showing that rising temperatures don't necessarily even correlate with blueberry maturation dates. Of course, even deciding the date of blueberry maturation is likely to be hard to do accurately.

Looking at the Blue Hill Observatory data the greatest correlation is between the temperature change and the wind speed. Increasing temperature correlates to decreasing wind speed. That is the opposite of what climate change theory would predict, indicating that the wind speed change probably results from other factors. Like the change in forest cover in New England.

Of course we wouldn't expect a professor of biology to realize that the amount of forested land affects the plants and animals in an area would we?

Blue Hill Observatory Data Graphs

46 posted on 06/19/2018 7:23:27 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
When my 75 year old mom was a kid she would find praying mantises here in Iowa. When I was a kid I was really into spiders and snakes but there were absolutely no praying mantises here. That was 45 years ago. Now they have been back for some 10 years.

It's a cycle.

PS: The sun is a variable star with a 0.1 percent variation every 70 years.

47 posted on 06/19/2018 7:23:52 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (...the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“These days, plants and animals are arriving at Rocky Mountain Biological Lab a week or two earlier than they were 30 years ago.”

Maybe the bus schedule has changed?


48 posted on 06/19/2018 7:25:34 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Globull Warming is here. It’s 95in Myrtle Beach today. Oh wait it’s f’ing June.


49 posted on 06/19/2018 7:26:54 AM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I’ve got a topographical map of Rhode Island and Narragansett Bay on my computer. Map was drawn in 1777 long before the industrial revolution, that started here. The salt water level in the bay hasn’t changed one inch in 241 years. When it does, I’ll start to worry.


51 posted on 06/19/2018 7:27:20 AM PDT by The Public Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Warmer weather is not a catastrophe. What's warmer are the winters.
Summer afternoons in much of the United States (East of the Rockies)
have enjoyed a cooling trend since the 19th century.

Here's what that looks like:

In a couple of days it will be 30 years since Dr. James Hansen
famously testified before the U.S. Congress about Global Warming.
It has been a triumph of propaganda for these last three decades;
a lot of people actually believe that warmer weather, more rain,
longer growing seasons, and CO2 augmented agriculture constitute
a looming catastrophic disaster.

59 posted on 06/20/2018 7:24:09 AM PDT by StACase (CO2 is NOT a Problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson