Things will never be right until you have voter ID. Watch what’s coming!
we shall see... very interesting if he does.
As expected an obstacle to completion of counting the ballots so the Democraps can review where the count is, and then manufacture enough votes to win.
Yeah, 100 thousand voters all named “Jose Cuervo”
Gee. Who whoulda thunk?
I can’t wait until I see the list of all of the people fired over this! YEAH!
Wait...what?...Nobody will be held responsible? Really?
We’re doomed.
Printing error = ballots in the trunk
Printing error .:.. phoey
Villar didn’t even win LA County despite having been Mayor Of Los Angeles for 8 years.
Ouch! It wasn’t his night.
I worked the polls yesterday. A number of individuals found that their names were missing from the poll books (they had been there previously). We also had a registration list of all voters in the district, and their names were on it. We gave them provisional ballots.
Later in the day I looked over the list and found the reason. In New Jersey only Republican, Democrat or unaffiliated are recognized. Unaffiliated must declare a recognized party to vote in any primary. The individuals in question were listed as Libertarian and Green party. The Ls took R ballots; the Greenie took a D ballot.
So it appears that they are simplifying the books by leaving out the irrelevant voters. But by taking an R or D provisional, I assume they are declaring for that party. You can’t change parties at the polls, but if unaffiliated you may affiliate. Since those other parties are not recognized, those voters, I assume, are considered unaffiliated.
When I ran that past the borough clerk she was as confused as the rest of us!
Our machines are NOT connected to any phone line, internet link or anything outside. Each machine, when first turned on in the morning, prints out a "zero proof" which shows any votes in the machine. If it is not all zeroes, we are to call the board of elections and not use that machine. It has never happened yet in our district, and I've not heard of it happening anywhere else.
So the only way a machine can be "hacked" would be at the warehouse in which it is stored between elections. Two machines per district, and hundreds of districts would require hundreds of RAT operatives working the warehouses to jigger the machines. Highly impractical, though not impossible. But there would have to be a few non-RAT techs who would expose the violation if they saw it.
Bottom line- I believe that they want to go back to paper because it is simpler to cheat by swapping out boxes or bags of ballots and "losing" or "finding" them, or adding additional markings (overvotes) to invalidate those that go against them than it is to jigger machines.
As BOR used to say, Where am I going wrong?
Old time Democrat voter suppression, aka ballot manipulation.