Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. top court backs companies over worker class-action claims
Rueters via Yahoo ^ | 5/21/2018 | Lawrence Hurley

Posted on 05/21/2018 11:36:50 AM PDT by freedumb2003

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: WASCWatch

>>Class actions only enrich the lawyers, one BOTH SIDES. <<

That is so the truth.

When I am sent one of those “you are a member of a class” forms I just throw them away” understanding I am forgoing the $2.00 on my next purchase of a laptop of a dime on a lime Squishee.

Class action lawsuits create people like John Edwards (the politician scam artist not the cold-reader scam artist).


21 posted on 05/21/2018 12:52:39 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (robert mueller is an unguided missile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Arbitration boards can be stacked in favor of a big client.

Class-Action suits, on the other hand, are almost always corrupt and a vehicle for lawyer enrichment or liberal policy promotion, or both.


22 posted on 05/21/2018 1:38:10 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("Married with children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

How much arbitration goes against the person paying the arbitrator?


23 posted on 05/21/2018 1:58:50 PM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
How much arbitration goes against the person paying the arbitrator?

For a while it was a scandal in the brokerage business. If your stockbroker screwed you, your contract for services with the broker left you little recourse but to use a financial industry approved arbitrator, and the arbitrator reportedly tended to find for the broker, or at least to minimize the damages assessed for the customer. I don't have figures.

In the industrial situation, I don't even know who pays for the arbitrator. I doubt that it is the injured worker; he wouldn't be able to afford it. I don't know if its the company on a direct per case basis, or its government involved, or there's some common association.

"Who pays" is very important. It's part of "following the money.".

24 posted on 05/21/2018 2:12:27 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("Married with children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Supreme Court sides with employers in class action arbitration cases

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/21/politics/supreme-court-nlra-arbitration-gorsuch/index.html


25 posted on 05/21/2018 8:26:56 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Bottom line: a contract willingly signed by an employee to eschew class-actions suits is actually a contract willingly signed by an employee to eschew class-actions suits.

What that's... that's just... CRAZY talk!

;-)

26 posted on 05/22/2018 11:57:46 AM PDT by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

My problem with this us that CEOs are typically just hired hands. They get all the benefits of employees as they are oddly covered by special gold plated employment contracts. Union employees get contracts too but much lesser.

If anyone should be at will employees the CEOS should be. They control the corporation. They are not employers.

Employees at large need parity with hired hand CEOs.


27 posted on 05/22/2018 4:33:32 PM PDT by apoliticalone (Political correctness should be defined as news media that exposes political corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Wait till someone writes a contract that makes the employee agree to binding arbitration in sexual harassment or race discrimination cases. That should tie our entire Federal Court system in knots for the next thirteen years.

Those contracts exist, and have been held enforceable.

28 posted on 05/23/2018 10:39:05 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson