Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Tried It: The $650 '(baby foreskin) Facial' That Sandra Bullock and Cate Blanchett Swear By
People ^

Posted on 05/19/2018 9:54:31 AM PDT by MNDude

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: duckman

Bris Cartel


81 posted on 05/19/2018 5:34:51 PM PDT by dontreadthis (A TIMELINE OF TREASON on Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

What a group of putz.


82 posted on 05/19/2018 6:37:16 PM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

again what the hell are you talking about ‘fake news’? I asked a question- Asking a question isn’t ‘fake news’ for crying out loud- Not sure what the hell you’re going on about?


83 posted on 05/19/2018 8:12:43 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

you’;re accusing me of fake news for asking a rhetorical question? Lol- talk about digging to the depths of hell for something to argue about-


84 posted on 05/19/2018 8:17:50 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: yeff

Now that was really SICK.

(but made me laugh)


85 posted on 05/20/2018 12:48:11 AM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question


86 posted on 05/20/2018 7:23:39 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

[[A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question that is asked to make a point rather than to elicit an answer.[1] Though a rhetorical question does not require a direct answer, in many cases it may be intended to start a discussion or at least draw an acknowledgement that the listener understands the intended message.]]

Exactly- not sure what is so hard to understand about that? There was no ‘fake news’ involved in asking a rhetorical question- Again=- still unclear what you are going on about ‘fake news’ for- it was a question- one that we all KNEW the answer to (hence the term rhetorical question- get it?)not a news item for crying out loud


87 posted on 05/20/2018 9:00:08 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis
There’s an irony in that refrain seen here but not this time

Gentiles in America are 99 percent circumcised too

What’s odd is Koreans are not

So someone is paying to have it done

88 posted on 05/20/2018 9:06:10 AM PDT by wardaddy (Reward for young runaway goes by Kanye fancies hisself a poet...if seen contact his overseer@DNC.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

“There was no ‘fake news’ involved in asking a rhetorical question”

Dude, you put it out as fact, which is is not. That is fake news. How hard is that to understand.


89 posted on 05/20/2018 9:32:47 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

[[Dude, you put it out as fact, which is is not]]WOW- no i did NOT- it was a rhetorical question- obviously you don’t understand what rhetorical questions are even though you linked to the very definition- I did NOT state it as fact or even as news— it was a simple question- what don’t YOU understand about that?


90 posted on 05/20/2018 9:58:46 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson