Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Reassures North Korea, But Threatens ‘Total Decimation’ Without A Deal
The Huffington Post ^ | May 18, 2018 | Mary Papenfuss

Posted on 05/18/2018 8:26:43 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

President Donald Trump tried to keep his planned talks with North Korea’s leader on track with reassuring words — then appeared to threaten “total decimation” if Kim Jong Un fails to reach a deal with the U.S. on nuclear arms.

Trump, responding to North Korea’s sudden threat on Tuesday to pull out of scheduled June talks, promised that Kim would remain in power and his country would get “very rich” if he abandons his nuclear weapons program. But the president appeared to issue his own warning if the two leaders fail to reach a deal.

Trump’s comments came after national security adviser John Bolton referred recently to the “Libyan model” for a North Korean pact. Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi agreed to shut down his nation’s fledgling nuclear program in 2003 so that sanctions against his country would be lifted. He was killed in 2011 by rebel forces backed by the U.S. and its allies.

North Korea called Bolton’s reference insulting and “sinister.” Pyongyang has in the past pointed to Gaddafi’s experience as a reason to maintain its nuclear weapons program....

(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: china; johnbolton; korea; libya; northkorea; pyongyang; trump

1 posted on 05/18/2018 8:26:43 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I noticed they don’t quote him.

They’re probably just making it up.


2 posted on 05/18/2018 8:29:09 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3656183/posts


3 posted on 05/18/2018 8:29:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

4 posted on 05/18/2018 8:32:32 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Democracy: The cliff's edge of Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Here’s some nice carrots and over here we have a stick that we will use to knock your head off. Your choice.


5 posted on 05/18/2018 8:36:08 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Here’s the official Whitehouse transcript from the website.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-secretary-general-stoltenberg-nato-bilateral-meeting/


6 posted on 05/18/2018 8:39:20 PM PDT by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What? Its only a tenth. The tenth that Kim happens to be in.


7 posted on 05/18/2018 8:39:35 PM PDT by joshua c (To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

The UGM-133A Trident II, or Trident D5 is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), built by Lockheed Martin Space Systems in Sunnyvale, California, and deployed with the American and British navies. It was first deployed in March 1990,[4] and remains in service. The Trident II Strategic Weapons System is an improved SLBM with greater accuracy, payload, and range than the earlier Trident C-4. It is a key element of the U.S. strategic nuclear triad and strengthens U.S. strategic deterrence. The Trident II is considered to be a durable sea-based system capable of engaging many targets. It enhances the U.S. position in strategic arms negotiation with performance and payload flexibility that can accommodate active treaty initiatives (see New START). The Trident II’s increased payload allows nuclear deterrence to be accomplished with fewer submarines,[10] and its high accuracy – approaching that of land-based missiles – enables it to be used as a first strike weapon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UGM-133_Trident_II


8 posted on 05/18/2018 8:41:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

Everyone misuses that word for some reason.


9 posted on 05/18/2018 8:42:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Re: Trump promised that Kim would remain in power

Another clear signal to every murderous dictator on planet Earth that the best way to preserve their money and their power is to develop or acquire nuclear weapons.


10 posted on 05/18/2018 9:56:13 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
carrot and stick...
11 posted on 05/18/2018 10:35:21 PM PDT by Chode (You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Art of the deal!

I’ve lately noticed a of people misusing “decimation” for total destruction. The word is annihilation. Decimation is reducing by 10 percent or more broadly a significant amount.


12 posted on 05/18/2018 11:00:15 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yup, it has been misused so much that it actually no longer means to reduce by a tenth.

The definition has shifted...and that’s OK, words take on new meanings.


13 posted on 05/19/2018 3:07:20 AM PDT by Bobalu (12 diet Cokes and a fried chicken...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Everyone misuses that word for some reason

Maybe not everyone, but a good nine out of ten.

14 posted on 05/19/2018 3:19:29 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“...then APPEARED to threaten total decimation...”

It “appears” to this author so he’ll have a story to write...

Without weasel words the press would be out of business.


15 posted on 05/19/2018 4:11:12 AM PDT by FrankR (If it wasn't for stupid ideas, the left would have no ideas at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

If not for the promise to stay in power Kim would get fine with EVERY Nork dying if he had the chance to cling to power one more day.


16 posted on 05/19/2018 8:05:15 AM PDT by jdsteel (Americans are Dreamers too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson