Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Multiple Pro-Gun Groups Submit Comments to ATF Over Proposed Bump Stock Ban
townhall.com ^ | 5/16/2018 | Beth Baumann

Posted on 05/16/2018 7:46:00 AM PDT by rktman

Gun Owners of America (GOA) and Gun Owners Foundation (GOF) on Tuesday submitted comments to the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) on the proposed bump stock ban.

These regulations will infringe the Second Amendment rights of Americans — the very same Americans who elected the current President based on his promises that he would defend those rights. Respectfully, we want to emphasize there is no legal authority to ban so-called “bump stocks” or “bump-fire stocks” by decree. An executive ban of bump stocks, by classifying them as machineguns [sic], would utterly contradict the plain text of the federal statute regulating machineguns [sic], even as the Obama administration repeatedly conceded

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 1a; 2a; banglist; kaba
Seems there are many valid points in the arguments against the ban. But, I ain't a lawyer and didn't sleep at a holiday in express last night but it appears pretty clear to me. For myself, I don't need a bump stock but am not bothered by someone else having one. Just like a suppressor. I'd like to get one and use it. But, my choice. Keep reading......
1 posted on 05/16/2018 7:46:00 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

NON print:

https://townhall.com/notebook/bethbaumann/2018/05/15/multiple-progun-groups-submit-comments-to-atf-over-bump-stock-ban-n2481088


2 posted on 05/16/2018 7:46:16 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Yes. It is an extra-constitutional ban of a legal product that is similar in nature to an “iran-deal” pile of garbage.

I don’t care if “our” guy did it or not!


3 posted on 05/16/2018 7:50:21 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Where is ATF mentioned in the 2nd Amendment?

Is the ATF some radical, violent hate group?


4 posted on 05/16/2018 8:07:05 AM PDT by TheNext
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Seems like they want to invalidate basic laws of physics.


5 posted on 05/16/2018 8:25:36 AM PDT by GMMC0987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The bump stock ban, so called, is meaningless gun grabber feel-good crapola, like so much of the anti-Second Amendment legislation.


6 posted on 05/16/2018 9:08:09 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

You would think that comprehension skills would be a little higher. It’s not that hard. Lucky for a majority of office holders there’s really no intelligence requirement to hold office. Not so lucky for us.


7 posted on 05/16/2018 9:11:02 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson