Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bible Professor Knocks Down David French’s Attack On Evangelical Trump Supporters
The Revolutionary Act ^ | 05/11/18

Posted on 05/11/2018 12:00:41 PM PDT by Liberty7732

Writing in National Review, David French launched another attack on evangelical Christians who support President Trump, calling them out as sinful compromisers denying the supreme purpose of God in their lives.

I wholeheartedly reject French’s rebuke as valid. It is wrong biblically, philosophically and, by extension, politically.

By way of context, I became a follower of Jesus Christ in 1982 when I was 17. Due to my submission to the authority of Scripture, I likewise fall into the category of what is commonly called “evangelical” — a term that is as frequently misunderstood as it is misused. I mention these points upfront since it is people like me who sit in the audience to which French was aiming his rebuke.

It landed hollow, however, because it is fraught with nonsense arguments, non-sequiturs and self-incriminating irony that French appears to miss. Below is just a brief glance at some of the main problems with his accusation.

⟹ French began the piece by asking what the ultimate goal of a Christian’s life should be. The lead was obvious: Evangelical Christians who support Trump have strayed from God’s purpose for their lives. French was in essence invoking God’s supreme purpose in Christ as the basis for why an Evangelical should not support Trump. However, the entire argument is nonsense. Everything that follows his opening question is non sequitur to that initial question. Just because pursuing the “common good” (i.e., civil righteousness) of one’s culture is not a Christian’s ultimate goal in this age, it does not follow that it is not an incredibly important responsibility. It is silly to negate numerous areas of God-ordained responsibilities on the premise of God’s ultimate purpose. French would undoubtedly argue that support for President Trump is antithetical to what is good for a nation; but that is an altogether different issue than his main and opening premise.

⟹ Voting for Trump and continuing to support the vast majority of his subsequent policies is without question a pursuit of the “common good” of our nation and culture. The choice to vote for Hillary Clinton, or even abstain from voting because Trump is a flawed man, is arguably a choice to pursue (or passively permit) overt and vile wickedness to prevail in the life of a nation. Present space does not permit me to itemize the progressive agenda and examine it in the light of the Good, the Beautiful, and the True — virtues that are revealed supremely in the character and nature of God. Suffice it to say that God expects (and will hold accountable) all post-Fall humans to live according to how we were created. Scripture describes it as God’s “image and likeness.” Even those people groups who deny His existence have long recognized fixed, uniform, and universal moral principles that are a part of our very moral fabric.

⟹ French has no authority to state that Evangelical Christians who voted for and support Trump are guilty of “sin.” He made no case from Scripture; it was merely a fiat judgment of his own making. Ironically, making such a judgment based solely on the basis of one’s opinion is a very serious charge. I don’t think French perceived the irony.

⟹ On the other hand, a positive case can be made, contra French, that one of the God-ordained responsibilities of a Christian is to actively oppose evil in one’s culture and promote that which is good. Again, Clinton and nearly every position she actively pursues is contrary, not only to the common good (viz., natural law), but to the very moral fabric of humans made in God’s image and likeness. While it is true that such responsibilities do not fall under the Christian’s relationship to God as Redeemer (in Christ); it is without question the duty of all human beings who relate to God as their Creator (whether they admit it or not). It is called loving your neighbor.

⟹ As already noted, French’s article made no sense. I am not stating this because I disagree with his assertions (which I do), but he demonstrates absolutely no correlation between his opinions and everything that goes before and after them. While he is certainly entitled to his own opinions, he is not entitled to determine his own facts — particularly ones that when disagreed with makes one guilty of “sin” in God’s sight.

Interestingly, if I were to take French’s own actions as my lead, I would have to conclude that the obligation of a Christian is to scold Evangelicals who voted for Trump and publicly shame them for this “sin” — and that this would be my supreme purpose.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christianvote; evangelicals; trump2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2018 12:00:41 PM PDT by Liberty7732
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

I thought we were supposed to be more pragmatic and moderate.

2 posted on 05/11/2018 12:03:34 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

I used to enjoy reading David French - until he got infected by Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS). Sad.

3 posted on 05/11/2018 12:04:49 PM PDT by Psalm 73 ("I will now proceed to entangle the entire area".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732
French has no authority to state that Evangelical Christians who voted for and support Trump are guilty of “sin.”

Gosh, I'm glad to hear that.

I was worried about his opinion of me.

4 posted on 05/11/2018 12:06:39 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732
Who am I going to believe, the Bible or some guy who wrote a blurb in his blog?


5 posted on 05/11/2018 12:09:20 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Totally agree. David French is misguided.

6 posted on 05/11/2018 12:19:15 PM PDT by Theo (FReeping since 1998 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Guys like French and Cal Thomas are always alleging that evangelicals who support Trump are not spiritual enough or do little to serve Him. Odd because I haven’t heard them pointing the finger at evangelicals supporting any other candidates.

7 posted on 05/11/2018 12:21:37 PM PDT by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

The Never-Trumpers don’t say it forthrightly, but their position comes down to Trump rejecting Bushism, i.e. “conservative” globalism. But Bushism was and is a pox on the Republican Party.

8 posted on 05/11/2018 12:23:15 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Our job as Christians (Romans 12) is to present ourselves to God as a living sacrifice, and thus to be useful to His purposes. We are to utilize whatever gifts He bestows on us to maximum advantage toward God’s purposes.

In the process, some of us are persuaded to have this or that sensibility, others are persuaded somewhat differently. These are peripheral issues vis-a-vis salvation. Romans 14 is crucial in this regard. First of all, it asks rhetorically, “who are you to judge another man’s servant?” And it concludes the section, with respect to peripheral issues, by saying “Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.”

9 posted on 05/11/2018 12:27:17 PM PDT by Migraine ((A smartass who is right can be downright funny. A smartass who is wrong is just a smartass.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Every outpost of Christianity, be it liberal or conservative, has its cadre of Pharisees. So it seems to be with French.

“But this crowd that does not know the Law, they are under a curse.” — John 7:49

10 posted on 05/11/2018 12:41:20 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

French and Thomas use the same line of argument the Devil used with Jesus in the wilderness. “You know you are hungry, thirsty and just want what is best for the world. I will give you all these things if you will kneel.” Jesus demurred. French and Thomas did not.
Trump is a warrior, not a priest. Evangelicals do not assign Christ-like qualities to Trump. They pray for him at all times, guide him when possible, and support him in his efforts to return this nation to its Christian heritage.
Evangelicals recognize that Trump is his own man and will not be bought by them or anyone. He has that singular quality missing in nearly all politicians, integrity.

11 posted on 05/11/2018 1:01:03 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Islam is Satans finest work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

French is just carrying on his anti-Trump rhetoric, trying to diminish Trump’s support among evangelicals. He was anti-Trump before, and he is anti-Trump now.

12 posted on 05/11/2018 1:05:08 PM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Sorry David but president Donald J. Trump is not calling on evangelicals to worship him like God. He is a man and scripture even says “o the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men. ” So go reexamine yourself instead of your brethren.

13 posted on 05/11/2018 1:19:03 PM PDT by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

I love it when cerebral narcissists get taken down a peg.

14 posted on 05/11/2018 1:50:04 PM PDT by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

since when do americans take advice from the french...

15 posted on 05/11/2018 2:21:06 PM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73; KC_Lion

How the heck did Sarah Palin ever get involved with these Frenches?

(Oh, right... all those RINO Bushies on McCain’s campaign... Schmidt, Wallaces, etc., probably recommended Nancy and David French. They are probably all in the same RINO Globalist home group).

16 posted on 05/11/2018 2:45:00 PM PDT by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Luke21; Psalm 73; KC_Lion

David French advocated that evangelicals were supposed to vote for a Mormon elder in the 2012 Presidential Election, what is he talking about here?

Voting for an anti Christian person who advocates anti Christian positions, such as Mormons, is a SIN... so what is David French talking about?

17 posted on 05/11/2018 2:54:27 PM PDT by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

French is Bill Kristol’s sock puppet. He is a shill for the neocons, it’s how French puts food on the table.

So French’s syllogism is: Donald Trump is a sinner who had a one-night stand with a porn star. Evangelicals should not support sinners. Ergo, evangelicals should not support Trump as president.

So who does French think is worthy of support as president? Evan McMullin.

Evan McMullin is a never-married man in his 40s who was raised by a lesbian mother who ‘married’ another woman. Presumably we are supposed to believe per French that McMullin has never engaged in sexual sin?

Evan McMullin is a Mormon. The belief system of Mormons is considered a gross heresy and a great sin by evangelical Christians.

But evangelical Christians should support Evan McMullin and refuse to support Donald Trump, because sinner.

Evidently Bill Kristol has the same view of evangelicals as the Washington Post in their famous formulation: “largely poor, uneducated and easy to command.”

18 posted on 05/11/2018 3:09:57 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

Obviously, THAT’S DIFFERENT, since French did it. He uses the same equivocation that liberals do; it’s ok for them to do a certain thing, but conservatives are NOT allowed to do the same.

19 posted on 05/11/2018 3:41:40 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

M-O-O-N that spells Apostate

20 posted on 05/11/2018 3:44:05 PM PDT by Right Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson