Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump has the constitutional authority to fire Mueller -- Here's why
Fox News ^ | April 21, 2018 | Hans A. von Spakovsky

Posted on 04/21/2018 3:27:52 PM PDT by jazusamo

It would be unconstitutional for Congress to prevent President Trump from firing Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is probing Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election.

I’m not saying that firing Mueller would be a wise move politically, nor am I urging the president to do so. That’s another issue.

But under the Constitution, it is beyond the power of Congress to limit or impose conditions on any president’s authority to remove a political appointee within the Justice Department or any other department in the executive branch.

Whether you think Donald Trump is an absolutely wonderful president or an absolutely awful one, this holds true, as it does for all other presidents, regardless of political party.

Senators Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Chris Coons, D-Del., are nevertheless pressing ahead to seek passage of legislation they are sponsoring called the Special Counsel Integrity Act. Under this bill, only the attorney general could discipline or remove a special counsel.

If the attorney general has been recused from the case (as Attorney General Jeff Sessions is with the Russia probe), then the “most senior Department of Justice official who has been confirmed by the Senate” could exercise this authority under the bill.

The bill further provides that a special counsel can be removed only for “misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or other good cause.” The special counsel has to be notified in writing of the “specific reason” for his removal, and the special counsel is given the right to file a lawsuit contesting his removal.

But despite denials by its proponents, this bill violates basic constitutional principles. Under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, the president is given the authority to appoint – with the approval of the Senate – “Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, Judges of the supreme...

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chriscoons; congress; integrityact; mueller; scintegrityact; specialcounsel; thomtillis; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 04/21/2018 3:27:52 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Of course he does..

The question is..

Does he want to deal with the shit storm that will fallow?


2 posted on 04/21/2018 3:37:59 PM PDT by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

Spokovsky’s piece is focused on the unconstitutionality of the proposed Special Counsel Integrity Act sponsored by Senators Thom Tillis and Chris Coons.


3 posted on 04/21/2018 3:46:24 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It would easier to get rid of the special counsel if they first were charged with being criminals by a second & third special counsel....or by AG Jeff Sessions. Otherwise, it would be best to find a nice, friendly, libertarian sort of judge or court & let him look at the law...& have courts shut down the illegal witch hunt.


4 posted on 04/21/2018 3:51:06 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s just a shallow political stunt. Congress could simply authorize a special counsel by law the way they did from 1978 to 1999. This Tillis stunt doesn’t do that.


5 posted on 04/21/2018 3:53:33 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

ex post facto laws are a violation of the Bill of Rights...especially one that-——after the fact—— limits a President’s power to defend & protect fundamental civil rights from illegal tyranny of unconfirmed special counsel investigations in search of crimes to charge & punish...for political reasons...not for reasons of justice or national security.


6 posted on 04/21/2018 3:54:03 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

From article, that law no longer exists:

“Congress allowed the independent counsel law to expire in 1999 after much criticism of the constitutionality and wisdom of such a law.”


7 posted on 04/21/2018 4:00:01 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I’ve been saying this since the Senate first mentioned it.

Unconstitutional.

PERIOD!!!


8 posted on 04/21/2018 4:04:26 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
OK,fair enough...DJT has the legal authority to fire Muller.And he most assuredly deserves to be fired.However,if DJT fires *any* of the main players he *will* be impeached regardless of who controls the House.

That's the *political* reality here.

9 posted on 04/21/2018 4:10:28 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (You Say "White Privilege"...I Say "Protestant Work Ethic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

MAGA!

Support Free Republic, Folks!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

10 posted on 04/21/2018 4:11:32 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

You’re probably correct and I fully believe President Trump is not even considering firing the jerk.


11 posted on 04/21/2018 4:13:48 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

If the democrats take back the House, he’ll be impeached.

They’ll FIND a reason.


12 posted on 04/21/2018 4:22:37 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (If white privilege is real, why do we have millions of poor white people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Rosenstein is the one to fire and it will be a twofer, worthless Jeff said he’ll quit if Trump fires the weasel.


13 posted on 04/21/2018 4:59:51 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I think rather than outright firing trump could declare a date when the investigation needs to be done.


14 posted on 04/21/2018 5:32:48 PM PDT by Cubs Fan (Trump is all that stands between America and left wing totalitarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I am floating into the who cares anymore about this government. This is nothing that resembles how it was designed. The left is p*ssed because they were within striking distance of destroying the country. The GOP’s reaction is absolutely galling.


15 posted on 04/21/2018 5:37:25 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cubs Fan

Now that Rudy Giuliani is on President Trump’s legal team I have a hunch they’ll be things happening in the near future, I pray there will be anyway.


16 posted on 04/21/2018 5:39:24 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I think it was already rumored that Mueller would be wrapping it up within a month. I believe Rudy is there as a watchdog.


17 posted on 04/21/2018 5:49:27 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Thanks, I hadn’t seen that.


18 posted on 04/21/2018 5:52:25 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Tenure of Office Act was unconstitutional in 1867 and it still is.


19 posted on 04/21/2018 5:59:10 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
It would be unconstitutional for Congress to prevent President Trump from firing Special Counsel Robert Mueller,

How would that work without sending the bill to POTUS?

They send it to POSTUS, he vetos and then what ? they have the votes of 2/3 of Congress to override ?
20 posted on 04/21/2018 6:25:21 PM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson