[Spok]

If the statute is unconstitutionally vague, its subject matter is irrelevant.

[Skywise]

I concur - as much as I dislike the outcome I prefer the rule of law and a proper reading of such.

Again, with that Roberts had been consistent with his reasoning regarding Obamacare.

[nonsporting]

If the statute is unconstitutionally vague, its subject matter is irrelevant.

So, any constitutionally vague statute is unconstitutional, no matter what its governing subject is.

Is that what you mean?