[nonsporting]

If the statute is unconstitutionally vague, its subject matter is irrelevant.

So, any constitutionally vague statute is unconstitutional, no matter what its governing subject is.

Is that what you mean?

[i_robot73]

>
If the statute is unconstitutionally vague, its subject matter is irrelevant.

So, any constitutionally vague statute is unconstitutional, no matter what its governing subject is.
>

‘Void for Vagueness’ WAS a valid decree....Before the Courts usurped authority over the whole of the Constitution.