“...a majority of the public doubts...”
A majority of the public doesn’t have access to the same intelligence reports and analysis that the POTUS does.
While I’m not thrilled at the thought of it, I have to give the President the benefit of the doubt that he knows more about it than I do.
I was sort of our of sorts about it; however, after using my brain rather than feelings and emotions, I determined that I was NOT the Commander in Chief and had no idea as to reasons for the attack. I trust President Trump.
“...a majority of the public doubts...”
A majority of the public doesn’t have access to the same intelligence reports and analysis that the POTUS does.
While I’m not thrilled at the thought of it, I have to give the President the benefit of the doubt that he knows more about it than I do.”
This^^^^^^^ How many of the doubters on this board saw the same evidence that President Trump saw.
What right or place do we have, to do anything in Syria?
We can’t take care of our own country!
>“...a majority of the public doubts...”
Sure, and so do I; but as we hit the places that manufacture chemicals, and explicitly stayed away from interference in the Syrian civil war or picking sides, this strike impedes whomever staged this.
Exactly.
Assad has at least two clear reasons to use gas: to win, by further terrorizing his domestic opponents; and to provide himself and his friends in Russia, Turkey, Iran, China, and North Korea with a test of the mettle of the new administration. After eight years of Obama’s bluster and retreat, Trump has them baffled by his combination of military buildup and a strong but mercurial persona that can spin from good cop to bad cop and back in an afternoon.
Thank you - so many “experts” who have only their imaginations to go on weighing in and ready to dump the best President in our lifetime because they are so dang smart - circular firing squad anyone?