Posted on 04/10/2018 7:37:08 PM PDT by WilliamIII
Last night Tucker Carlson questioned whether the Assad regime was actually responsible for the recent Syria chemical attack, stunning a lot of people, but Carlson stood by it tonight and told viewers people want them to just “shut up.”
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
Pretty much. Meet the new boss...
Tucker has worked with Alex Jones. I would be surprised if Tucker didn’t follow Q, so he knows that the perpetrator has not yet been determined.
For Tucker and like-minded isolationists, there is no proof possible.
I am glad Tucker mentioned that when someone says we need to get out of Syria he will be called a Putinista, unpatrotic, etc.
Happens on FR constantly.
We have no idea who used the chemical weapons or even if they were used.
It seems like a set up.
A real sucker play.
“there is no proof possible”
It would be nice to see proof before war. Hasn’t been any yet. Even Trump admitted that in his tweet calling for “verification”
“Tucker has worked with Alex Jones”
I never heard that. Do you have proof?
There is an audio online of the conversation with the helicopter pilot. Don’t know where it is though.
Thought this was a good read, that the pretext of Assad is to degrade Russia’s influence in the Levant.
Tucker made good points. This Assad hysteria reminds me of Bush crying about Iraq’s WMD.
“We have no idea who used the chemical weapons or even if they were used.”
Our military has already determined exactly where the WMD came from, bet on that.
Don’t forget bush sr and babies being thrown out of incubators
Let’s say for the sake of argument, proof that Assad gassed his own people was irrefutable.
What is the compelling national interest that justifies attacking a sovereign nation that didn’t attack us and risking a war with its nuclear power ally Russia?
From Iraq?
Where are the propaganda stories about mass graves and Syrian soldiers removing babies from hospital incubators to die?
After we got rooked into a war by an ambassador’s lying daughter, you’d think we’d know better.
I see no good reason to get involved in Syria. It would have only negative consequences.
As someone who has viewed raw intel (on other matters, before I retired), you are unlikely to ever see evidence to satisfy you.
Involves too much ‘multi-int’, meaning sig-int, geo-int, op-int, e-lint, some multi-national sources, and hum-int.
On Russian television last night, they were advising people on what to take to bomb shelters. Last Friday Putin convened a war cabinet in Moscow.
I am always amazed at that TPTB don’t think of all the possible outcomes. I remember reading recently the numbers our Military deemed acceptable as far as dead Americans inside the United States if we went to war with Russia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.