Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scoop: Netanyahu privately predicts Trump will withdraw from Iran deal
Axios ^ | 3/15/18 | Barak Ravid

Posted on 03/15/2018 3:36:00 PM PDT by DoodleDawg

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told his security cabinet his assessment is that President Trump will most likely withdraw the U.S. from the Iran nuclear deal in May, according to two ministers who attended the meeting.

The backdrop: Netanyahu was briefing the security cabinet Sunday on his meeting with Trump earlier this month. He said Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of Defense James Mattis, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster and Chief of Staff John Kelly had all been present for the discussion on Iran.

According to the two ministers, Netanyahu said in Sunday's meeting:

"I think Trump is very close to withdrawing from the Iran deal. The meeting was very important. Trump spoke in front of all the most senior members of his administration and told me that if the nuclear deal would not change significantly the U.S. will withdraw." The prime minister's office did not dispute this account but refrained from commenting on it.

Israeli officials say that the departure of Secretary of State Tillerson is another sign that Trump is headed towards withdrawing from the Iran deal. They said Israel was very happy with the appointment of Mike Pompeo as the new Secretary of State mainly due to his hawkish views on Iran in general and especially on the Iran deal.

Tillerson was almost non-existent when it came to the U.S.-Israeli relationship and was perceived in the Israeli government as "problematic" due to his opposition to U.S. withdrawal from the Iran deal. Tillerson visited Israel once during his time in office and even then it was with President Trump. Pompeo visited Israel three times during his first year as CIA director.

Netanyahu issued a statement yesterday welcoming Pompeo's appointment and praising his abilities and experience. Netanyahu's statement did not mention Tillerson at all.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; israel; trump
Source is an Israeli reporter so there's probably something to this.

But it's not much of a scoop. Trump's hatred of the Iran deal is well known. The scoop would be Trump not withdrawing rather than withdrawing.

The question is what Netanyahu thinks will happen next?

1 posted on 03/15/2018 3:36:00 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

We’re not in the Iran deal. Obama did not have legal authority to commit the U.S.


2 posted on 03/15/2018 3:38:15 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Good.

Trump cited differences on the Iran deal as one reason for Tillerson’s being fired.


3 posted on 03/15/2018 3:39:31 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing
We’re not in the Iran deal. Obama did not have legal authority to commit the U.S.

You can argue legality but in it we are. The question is what people think will happen when we're not.

4 posted on 03/15/2018 3:39:41 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

He also went behind his back.


5 posted on 03/15/2018 3:44:21 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Screw The NFL!!!!!! My family fought for the flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

McConnell could have demanded that Obama submit “the deal” as a treaty to the senate.

When Obama wouldn’t release “the deal” to the senate, but in His magnificence allowed individual senators to view “the deal” in a SCIF, I decided not to vote in the 2016 congressional election.

Pubbies are much more comfortable in the minority. Our post-17th Amendment senate is an institution without a purpose.


6 posted on 03/15/2018 3:57:54 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

You can argue legality but in it we are. The question is what people think will happen when we’re not.


Never ratified by the Senate. It’s illegal. Trump can just ignore it.


7 posted on 03/15/2018 3:59:49 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Why does the journalist deceive us with this title: “Privately”. The article’s existence shows this to be not true...


8 posted on 03/15/2018 4:05:20 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

The dots - Tillerson fought the Embassy move and he is gone. McMaster always hated Israel and he fought the move. He will be next. I am not sure about Kelly at this point. Pence has always been an Israel supporter. Think of the movie “The Godfather”, where Mike tells Tom Haden he is out because he is not a ‘war time Consigliere’. Tillerson was Tom Haden. Pompeo will be a wartime Concigliere. Also, I hear that John Bolton will replace McMaster. Again, pro Israel. Netanyahu is getting ready to clean iran’s clock, which could involve eventually drawing Russia into the fray. None of this is based on fact - just guessing.


9 posted on 03/15/2018 4:11:38 PM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing
Never ratified by the Senate. It’s illegal. Trump can just ignore it.

It's an agreement. Trump doesn't have to ignore it. Obama got us into it, Trump can withdraw us from it.

10 posted on 03/15/2018 4:16:01 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

It’s possible the President wanted this discussion to come out, but couldn’t have his own people “leak” it.


11 posted on 03/15/2018 5:10:24 PM PDT by NutsOnYew (If the world was perfect, it wouldn't be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

It was another public gesture made by Barry that was official-looking but essentially unlawful.


12 posted on 03/15/2018 5:20:05 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NutsOnYew
It’s possible the President wanted this discussion to come out, but couldn’t have his own people “leak” it.

This administration leaks like the Titanic. Trump doesn't have to have someone do it for him.

13 posted on 03/16/2018 3:39:37 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson