Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Trump Administration is calling on every State to adopt Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs)"
The White House ^ | March 12, 2018 | The White House

Posted on 03/13/2018 9:25:23 AM PDT by NobleFree

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: NobleFree

A very bad idea. Making government more powerful has never solved a problem.


21 posted on 03/13/2018 10:07:11 AM PDT by Dandy (Drain the swamp baby!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

A very bad idea. Making government more powerful has never solved a problem.


22 posted on 03/13/2018 10:07:11 AM PDT by Dandy (Drain the swamp baby!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonascord

Sounds like Child Prot. Svcs. are going to have a field day with this as well.


23 posted on 03/13/2018 10:08:00 AM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

No, not enough safeguards (eg FISA) to keep a government from going rogue and taking any gun they want based on “their” opinion of people. Nope. Dead ender.


24 posted on 03/13/2018 10:16:25 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (We are getting even more than we voted for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

“Your Honor, the suspect posts on Freerepublic.”

‘that’s it, he’s insane, sieze the guns!’


25 posted on 03/13/2018 10:19:29 AM PDT by Rebelbase ( Hillary, DNC, DOJ and FBI colluded with a British National to influence the 2016 Pres. election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D Rider
He is making it a states rights issue.

The USSC has ruled that individuals have protected rights under 2A.

26 posted on 03/13/2018 10:21:28 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree
The USSC has ruled that individuals have protected rights under 2A.

Of course, and the states will have to structure their "Extreme Risk Protection Orders" laws accordingly, or risk having them overturned. Also, individuals can choose whether they wand to remain in a state that passed really repugnant ones, the old voting with your feet. Federal laws remove that basic individual choice. Putting it on the states is a win-win.

27 posted on 03/13/2018 10:27:57 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

And the LEOs can do what they wish when they wish with no regard for the innocence of the person.

As if LEOs are licensed psychologists and medical doctors.

What could possibly go wrong?


28 posted on 03/13/2018 10:30:57 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

What happened to the 72 hour emergency protection orders that permitted people (not guns) to be taken into custody for the purpose of evaluation and competency hearings? Inanimate items are not the issue here despite the pressing whine of the Obozo holdovers.


29 posted on 03/13/2018 10:32:51 AM PDT by Steamburg (Other people's money is the only language a politician respects; starve the bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree
Shouldn't the title match the one you are linking?
I know you gave the title in the first post, but the two should probably have been switched around.
30 posted on 03/13/2018 10:37:59 AM PDT by FreedomOfExpression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

?


31 posted on 03/13/2018 10:38:29 AM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree
How about known gang members?
That's too dangerous, let's first go after the old lady who's afraid of going outside.

32 posted on 03/13/2018 10:41:51 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D Rider
the states will have to structure their "Extreme Risk Protection Orders" laws accordingly, or risk having them overturned.

Some states will be happy to violate 2A for as long as they can while the matter drags through the levels of the federal judicial system.

Federal laws remove that basic individual choice. Putting it on the states is a win-win.

No, it's a lose-less.

33 posted on 03/13/2018 10:45:40 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg
My sentiments exactly.
34 posted on 03/13/2018 10:47:06 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree
We disagree

You forgot to address this comment:"...individuals can choose whether they want to remain in a state that passed really repugnant ones, the old voting with your feet."

35 posted on 03/13/2018 10:54:01 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

“What constitutes a “demonstrated threat to themselves or others”?”

A recent example of a kid shooting up a school in Florida comes to mind, where he was reported to various authorities (including by himself) as an immediate & serious threat ... and nothing was done.

Methinks ERPOs are just a clarification of existing law: if a reasonable person reports to a reasonable cop who asks a reasonable judge who concludes it’s reasonable to disarm someone as an unreasonable threat to others AND who will be subsequently hauled into court to face relevant charges or institutionalization (thus having a chance to, in a timely fashion, refute the accusations and reclaim armaments) - that’s already the norm, just needing clarification so such BS as the Broward County “no arrest” agreement doesn’t impede halting a real threat to the community.


36 posted on 03/13/2018 10:58:23 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The Red Queen wasn't kidding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

“What happened to the 72 hour emergency protection orders that permitted people (not guns) to be taken into custody for the purpose of evaluation and competency hearings?”

This is the proper pushback.
If someone is that much of a threat, taking guns isn’t the solution - the person may have more, or acquire other means of causing grave harm.


37 posted on 03/13/2018 11:05:27 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The Red Queen wasn't kidding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

Every single day that goes by that I don’t hear about a new Carl Drega taking things into his own hands, I’m both amazed, and saddened.


38 posted on 03/13/2018 11:10:18 AM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

Hopefuuly POTUS.45 floats these things for the responses alone; he knows it won’t fly anyway, but he gets to shape and model it for the public’s reaction that He wants!
If so, he can always claim he “tried”.
**************************
They don’t think of him as Tricky Donald fer nuthin;!
;)
Gunny G@PlanetWTF?
******************************


39 posted on 03/13/2018 11:21:58 AM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

Two choices.

1) Get the crazies off the street and remove them from the schools to prevent other mass shootings or lessens their number of frequencies. Every prevented mass shooting event is one less chance for the Dems and their press to politize.

2) Or take chances that another school mass shooting does not happen, but if it does, the Left mobilizes under Soros and the Dems against the 2nd Amendment in their further attempt to erode the Constitution.

Both have drawbacks.


40 posted on 03/13/2018 11:35:29 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson