Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NobleFree
The USSC has ruled that individuals have protected rights under 2A.

Of course, and the states will have to structure their "Extreme Risk Protection Orders" laws accordingly, or risk having them overturned. Also, individuals can choose whether they wand to remain in a state that passed really repugnant ones, the old voting with your feet. Federal laws remove that basic individual choice. Putting it on the states is a win-win.

27 posted on 03/13/2018 10:27:57 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: D Rider
the states will have to structure their "Extreme Risk Protection Orders" laws accordingly, or risk having them overturned.

Some states will be happy to violate 2A for as long as they can while the matter drags through the levels of the federal judicial system.

Federal laws remove that basic individual choice. Putting it on the states is a win-win.

No, it's a lose-less.

33 posted on 03/13/2018 10:45:40 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson