Skip to comments.
Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale: Democrats
Reuters - Yahoo News ^
| 08-March-2018
| Warren Strobel
Posted on 03/09/2018 7:36:07 AM PST by ptsal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: ptsal
So now the Democrats need evidence before making allegations? I notice that courtesy isn't extend to Trump.
I would point out that releasing a statement that 'there is no evidence' is a good strategy if the evidence relates to security issues. The other side is not in a position to easily release the evidence to prove your assertion false.
21
posted on
03/09/2018 8:52:22 AM PST
by
CommerceComet
(Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
To: ptsal
If they look they can find 145,000 reasons Clinton benefited from the Uranium One deal. Oh and here is a clue: Look at her bank account.
22
posted on
03/09/2018 8:58:00 AM PST
by
notpoliticallycorewrecked
(Will the last responsible person leaving California, please turn out the lights.)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
23
posted on
03/09/2018 9:08:05 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: ptsal
“Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale”
And of course, the lying media is happy to repeat and amplify ad nauseam such trope.
24
posted on
03/09/2018 9:15:54 AM PST
by
miniTAX
(au)
To: ptsal
Even my cat saw it a mile away.
25
posted on
03/09/2018 10:25:47 AM PST
by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: Paladin2
BINGO!!! AUDIT THE CLINTON CRIME FAMILY SLUSH FUNDS!!! ALL OF THEM!!
Oh...I forgot....they put one of the big ones in CANADA because you aren't allowed to audit them in Canada!
26
posted on
03/09/2018 10:28:16 AM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: ptsal
No evidence if you discount his Russian connections telling him they donated millions and paid for speeches to influence the Clinton’s...
27
posted on
03/09/2018 10:38:26 AM PST
by
PigRigger
(Satire is near impossible now. Liberals donÂ’t understand it and for conservatives it is reality.)
To: dirtboy
Except for the large multi-million dollars in contributions to their foundation from the folks who benefited from the sale.
So there was no quid pro quo, just concerned citizens of the world donating to a worthy cause...
28
posted on
03/09/2018 10:58:14 AM PST
by
shotgun
To: PigRigger
No evidence if you discount his Russian connections telling him they donated millions and paid for speeches to influence the Clinton’s... Can't convict politicians with circumstantial evidence, only murderers.
29
posted on
03/09/2018 11:27:28 AM PST
by
itsahoot
(There will be division, as long as there is money to be divided.)
To: hal ogen
Comey and Mueller were going to be her evidence suppressors had she won the election.
Thank you Lord for looking out for our true interests.
We are beholden to ya.
30
posted on
03/09/2018 4:23:21 PM PST
by
Slyfox
(Not my circus, not my monkeys)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
