Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale: Democrats
Reuters - Yahoo News ^ | 08-March-2018 | Warren Strobel

Posted on 03/09/2018 7:36:07 AM PST by ptsal

Democrats said they were releasing a summary of the session because majority Republicans, who control the panels involved, refused to approve the preparation of a full transcript.

"Mr. Campbell identified no evidence that Secretary Hillary Clinton, President Bill Clinton, or anyone from the Obama Administration took any actions as a result of Russian requests or influence," the summary says.

=====rearranged the paragraphs==== An informant whom House Republicans have said could reveal a link between a 2010 sale of U.S. uranium supplies and donations to the Clinton Foundation provided no evidence of that during a four-hour interview with congressional staff last month, Democrats said on Thursday.

The informant, lobbyist William D. Campbell, "provided no evidence of a quid pro quo involving Secretary (Hillary) Clinton or the Clinton Foundation and no evidence that Secretary Clinton was involved in, or improperly influenced" the uranium sale, the Democrats said in a five-page summary of the Feb. 7 interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: campbell; clinton; evidence; uranium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
**more** The Uranium One sale was unanimously approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which comprises representatives of nine U.S. government agencies. When the issue was voted on, the State Department was represented not by Clinton, but by a lower-level official.

Five committees in the U.S. House and Senate previously looked into the issue and found no evidence that Clinton was behind CFIUS' approval of the deal, according to congressional records.

1 posted on 03/09/2018 7:36:07 AM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Audit the Clintoon “Foundations”.


2 posted on 03/09/2018 7:37:14 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Nothing like having the Democrat MINORITY bull ahead with their release of information.

Sounds like a violation of the committee’s rules and ethics. /s


3 posted on 03/09/2018 7:37:19 AM PST by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

More spin.

But they want Trump investigated forever for non-existent Russian collusion.

Got it.


4 posted on 03/09/2018 7:38:12 AM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal
Well DUH! What good is BleachBit if you can't destroy evidence permanently. Geez ...
5 posted on 03/09/2018 7:40:03 AM PST by Be Free (I believe in gun control. The more people that control their own guns, the safer we'll all be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Informant had plenty of evidence of Russian interference, yet the deal was still approved. And the Clintoons are too smart in the ways of corruption to leave smoking guns of a quid pro quo lying around. So this is meaningless.


6 posted on 03/09/2018 7:40:23 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

No amount of allegations, evidence or facts are serious enough for certain select Democrats to be thought badly of by other Democrats.


7 posted on 03/09/2018 7:40:58 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Attorney Victoria Toensing Blasts Lying Dems For Claiming Uranium One Informant Provided ‘No Evidence’ of Clinton ‘Quid Pro Quo’


8 posted on 03/09/2018 7:48:27 AM PST by Bratch ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

ANYTHING the Clinton mob gets involved with provides money or power for them. Grifters supreme.


9 posted on 03/09/2018 7:51:26 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Yup, and the $145 million in donations to the Clintoon’s Foundation from beneficiaries of the Uranium One sale was purely coincidental!!!

Such accomplished LIARS.


10 posted on 03/09/2018 7:52:37 AM PST by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

The fact that said informant is still breathing implies that he either knows nothing, or his silence has been bought off by the “Clinton Foundation”.


11 posted on 03/09/2018 7:52:55 AM PST by ssaftler (Just another sunny day in the land of the fruits, nuts, flakes and illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal
"Mr. Campbell (closed his eyes and ears to make sure he) identified no evidence that Secretary Hillary Clinton, President Bill Clinton, or anyone from the Obama Administration took any actions as a result of Russian requests or influence," the summary says. .....
12 posted on 03/09/2018 7:56:24 AM PST by trebb (I stopped picking on the mentally ill hypocrites who pose as conservatives...mostly ;-})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

It only took ONE vote to scuttle the deal.


13 posted on 03/09/2018 8:01:18 AM PST by Mouton (The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

“Mr. Campbell identified no evidence that Secretary Hillary Clinton, President Bill Clinton, or anyone from the Obama Administration took any actions as a result of Russian requests or influence,”

Nah, they just did it out of the kindness of their hearts.


14 posted on 03/09/2018 8:04:21 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

“You have no proof that 2+2=4” - Democrats


15 posted on 03/09/2018 8:18:35 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

I always have to ask “In what form might such evidence exist?” How would one find such evidence?

Would there be a receipt from the Clinton Foundation? How about a “thank you” note from Hill & Bill “Thanks so much for your contribution, enjoy your isotopes?” “Helluva speech there, Bill, tell Hillary we really appreciate the yellowcake?” “You’re really an alpha male there, Bill, thanks for the rays!”


16 posted on 03/09/2018 8:20:38 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

That statement is preposterous. Any one vote from the CFIUS team can stop it, and to think a decision this momentus was left up to a state dept flunkie defies rational thought. The FBI had informants as well and Mueller buried the criminality for 5 years to help Hillary.

The document is a sham.

Why did McCabe of the FBI stop the investigation into the Clinton Fund? All corrupt


17 posted on 03/09/2018 8:20:51 AM PST by Titus-Maximus (It doesn't matter who votes for whom, it only matters who counts the votes - Joe Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

So, she must be innocent then, huh?


18 posted on 03/09/2018 8:23:15 AM PST by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

“...had no evidence...” doesn’t negate that it happened and that she’s guilty as he**. Lock her up prior to stretching her neck (after a fair trial and guilty verdict, of course).


19 posted on 03/09/2018 8:46:28 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Don’t ask; don’t tell.


20 posted on 03/09/2018 8:47:42 AM PST by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson