Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Administration Sues California Over Immigration Laws
NY Times ^ | 03-06-2018 | KATIE BENNER and JENNIFER MEDINA

Posted on 03/06/2018 6:08:16 PM PST by NRx

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: NRx

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2001-title8/html/USCODE-2001-title8-chap12.htm

CHAPTER 12—IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

§1373. Communication between government agencies and the Immigration and Naturalization Service
(a) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, a Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual.

(b) Additional authority of government entities

Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, no person or agency may prohibit, or in any way restrict, a Federal, State, or local government entity from doing any of the following with respect to information regarding the immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual:

(1) Sending such information to, or requesting or receiving such information from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

(2) Maintaining such information.

(3) Exchanging such information with any other Federal, State, or local government entity.

(c) Obligation to respond to inquiries

The Immigration and Naturalization Service shall respond to an inquiry by a Federal, State, or local government agency, seeking to verify or ascertain the citizenship or immigration status of any individual within the jurisdiction of the agency for any purpose authorized by law, by providing the requested verification or status information.

§1330. Collection of penalties and expenses
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2001-title8/html/USCODE-2001-title8-chap12.htm

(3)(A) The Secretary of the Treasury shall refund out of the Immigration Enforcement Account to any appropriation the amount paid out of such appropriation for expenses incurred by the Attorney General for activities that enhance enforcement of provisions of this subchapter.

Such activities include—

(i) the identification, investigation, apprehension, detention, and removal of criminal aliens;
(ii) the maintenance and updating of a system to identify and track criminal aliens, deportable aliens, inadmissible aliens, and aliens illegally entering the United States; and

(iii) for the repair, maintenance, or construction on the United States border, in areas experiencing high levels of apprehensions of illegal aliens, of structures to deter illegal entry into the United States.

(B) The amounts which are required to be refunded under subparagraph (A) shall be refunded at least quarterly on the basis of estimates made by the Attorney General of the expenses referred to in subparagraph (A). Proper adjustments shall be made in the amounts subsequently refunded under subparagraph (A) to the extent prior estimates were in excess of, or less than, the amount required to be refunded under subparagraph (A).

(C) The amounts required to be refunded from the Immigration Enforcement Account for fiscal year 1996 and thereafter shall be refunded in accordance with estimates made in the budget request of the Attorney General for those fiscal years. Any proposed changes in the amounts designated in such budget requests shall only be made after notification to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate in accordance with section 605 of Public Law 104–134.

(D) The Attorney General shall prepare and submit annually to the Congress statements of financial condition of the Immigration Enforcement Account, including beginning account balance, revenues, withdrawals, and ending account balance and projection for the ensuing fiscal year.


21 posted on 03/06/2018 6:57:54 PM PST by Haddit (Minimalists Al Gore and Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Ok

I am going into a brain slobber thinking of that


22 posted on 03/06/2018 6:59:50 PM PST by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! Merry Christmas! In God We Trust!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Immigration and national security are issues which are the purview of the federal government, not the states. The federal government is an agreement reached among the states. If you harbor illegals, you are stabbing the rest of the states in the back and reneging on your legal, constitutional agreement to adhere to a common policy on this issue. Illegal immigration is an issue that effects the whole country which is why the founders gave the federal government authority over it.

Is California able to prevent the illegals they harbor from crossing over into neighboring states, transporting drugs to the rest of the country, or planning terror attacks to be inflicted on the rest of the country? Of course not. Their actions endanger the country as a whole, not just their own state, and are illegal.

If a state wants to pass a speed limit of 40 mph, or tax soft drinks at 200%, that’s their business, but California is breaking their agreement with the 49 other states when they undermine federal policy on this issue, which they are constitutionally bound to follow.


23 posted on 03/06/2018 7:00:41 PM PST by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Hell with that. Send Federal troops into Kalifornia and FORCE ‘em to obey the law. Just like Lincoln and Eisenhower sent troops into the Southern States years ago.

If they refuse to obey, lock ‘em up. And if necessary, shoot them.

What’s good for the goose is good for the “Resistance.”


24 posted on 03/06/2018 7:18:52 PM PST by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

“If a state wants to pass a speed limit of 40 mph, or tax soft drinks at 200%, that’s their business, but California is breaking their agreement with the 49 other states when they undermine federal policy on this issue, which they are constitutionally bound to follow.”

Bingo.


25 posted on 03/06/2018 7:22:48 PM PST by NRx (A man of integrity passes his father's civilization to his son, without selling it off to strangers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer

THIS!! ^^^^


26 posted on 03/06/2018 7:37:27 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America...Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NRx
Becerra has sued Trump and the feds dozens of time. He's become a real nuisance who's looking for a fight, who actually threatened Trump.

Here is a quote from Mr. Becerra from 9/2017;

“California is not looking to pick a fight,” he said. “But if Trump is trying to get in our way, that’s when we go at it.”

27 posted on 03/06/2018 7:45:12 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

To leftists like the NYT, no immigration is illegal. The only thing illegal are white Americans...being a white, hetero male, now that’s a capital crime.


28 posted on 03/06/2018 7:46:54 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Winning!!!!

awesome president :)


29 posted on 03/06/2018 7:52:45 PM PST by CottonBall (Thank you, Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

“I want the army in there to arrest brown and the entire legislature.”

Me too, and I live in CA. And make sure that they arrest the Republicans too while they’re at it, because they are very much part of the whole problem of lawlessness here.


30 posted on 03/06/2018 8:16:32 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Hollywood will hate Trump even more. They are about to loose all the under paid for din invading house staffs.


31 posted on 03/06/2018 8:40:31 PM PST by Retvet (Retvet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Donald Trump is the best thing to ever happen to California.


32 posted on 03/06/2018 9:16:34 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Yes yes yes
Heard it on my sheepish local radio tonight in the GAY BAY
LOVE IT

TIMES 6000000


33 posted on 03/06/2018 9:19:22 PM PST by Truthoverpower (The guvmint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

“The gov did not sue Little Rock”

Yes they did, and Alabama too.

It was the Fed Court order that was presented to each before it escalated to Federalizing the National Guard.


34 posted on 03/06/2018 9:20:16 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NRx

The SCOTUS precedent on SB1070 will bury California.


35 posted on 03/06/2018 11:28:53 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Next time I hear a Dem libtard progressive scream Rule of Law, I am going to either put my hands on them or laugh my arse off. =.=


36 posted on 03/07/2018 12:06:06 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Secede. Pleaaase. Get armed insurrection brutally put down and all participants disenfranchised pursuant to the 15th Amendment. Pleeeeeease!


37 posted on 03/07/2018 12:14:27 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; NRx

>
Don’t sue

Send the US Marshalls to arrest the politicians who are abetting the illegals
>

THANK YOU. JHC, govt can’t watch and chew gum @ the same time?!

Round up the clowns and THEN file.

What’s next, they going to let the lower courts make @sses of themselves, wasting taxpayer $$ and all of our time, instead of going directly to SCOTUS??


38 posted on 03/07/2018 5:40:36 AM PST by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All
Attention, Socialists of all stripes:

39 posted on 03/07/2018 5:54:54 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NRx

About time. The next step?

I’d say that unless they in kalifornia, cease and desist, that a state of insurrection against the United States exists.

Taken to the ultimate conclusion, this is what the Insurrection Act of 1807 (amended in 2006) was created for.

They have been warned.


40 posted on 03/07/2018 6:12:56 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson