[null and void]

Nully's modest proposal to end voter fraud:

• Paper ballots
• Purple fingers
• Mandatory free on demand BIOMETRIC (iris scan, nobody ever left their irises at a crime scene!) photo ID, with a database that instantly flags for arrest anyone seeking multiple IDs. Change of name? Simply have your old card voided when you apply for the new one.
• No precinct reports their totals until ALL precincts report they have totals. This prevents the last to report precinct captains from knowing how much to fudge a report to give a win to their preferred candidate while maintaining some slight semblance of credibility.
• Repeal Motor Voter.
• End same-day registration where it exists, and allow ample time between registration and election for vetting of credentials of registrants.
• Instantly deport any non-citizen who registers to vote.
• Voter ID must be renewed every 10 years, in person.
• Put a little ⩍ next to the names of those registered voters with death certificates, and detain and put a 72 hour psychiatric hold anyone claiming to be a dead person...

Of course, if this is a federal law, it would only apply to federal elections. If a state, county, city or wide spot in the road doesn't want to control who votes, they can pay to have separate local ballots for any munchkin who wanders in on election day printed out of their own pocket.

[Leo Carpathian]

“Final solution to the Illegal Immigration
and Voter Fraud problems”
at
http://www.AmericanSkyNews.com

[John O]

Good proposal. But I have issue with item 7.

Non-citizens who attempt to vote are committing an act of war against these United States and should be treated accordingly. (citizens who enable such an attack are committing treason) Either life in prison at some off shore facility (GITMO) or execution. Deporting them just lets them try again and encourages others to attack us.

We need to make the world fear us again.

[rlmorel]

Those are great suggestions. Excellent, very well thought out. Very commonsense and do-able.

Gee. Why on earth couldn’t these type of things be talked about at a national level in a way that the government is looking out for the good of the citizenry and the sovereignty of the country?

Why?

Because the Left doesn’t have the “good of the citizenry” nor the “sovereignty of the country” first and foremost.

What they have first and foremost is their own power and ability to oppress those who don’t agree with them.