Posted on 02/28/2018 11:58:45 AM PST by Para-Ord.45
...To better understand the tactics Mueller may have employed to obtain a Flynn guilty plea, let’s look at a typical scenario in the Mueller system to see how accusations of lying were used to decide disciplinary cases.
Now, let’s say Mueller wanted the option to dismiss Smith even if the facts of the case did not support dismissal. To make this possible, after an investigation, the centerpiece of which would be Smith’s testimony, a proposal would be made by Mueller’s surrogate charging Smith with lying.
The charge would likely hinge on something as indistinct from each other as the color “scarlet” and the color “red.” The charge also would be likely to misrepresent the significance of supporting evidence or omit contradicting evidence, or both.
Hence, the charge might be worded like this:
“When asked to describe the vehicle you drove to the dinner party, you said the vehicle’s color is red. However, the manufacturer lists the color as scarlet. Since you attended a university whose official color is scarlet, you should have known the difference between scarlet and red. I, therefore, charge you with ‘lying under oath,’ and if found to be true, that you be dismissed from the FBI.”
...The parallels between Mueller’s system and the circumstances of Flynn’s guilty plea are clear.
...My experience as an FBI agent taught me to look to the past to predict the future. Using disingenuous allegations of lying to decide judicial matters is Mueller’s past. It appears this practice continued in the Flynn case. I believe it explains the contradictory assessments of Flynn’s veracity and may explain why Flynn pled guilty instead of opting for his day in court.
AuthorJames S. Davidson was an FBI special agent for 23 years. He investigated major crimes in Texas and California and served in Ukraine, Israel and Washington. He is now the CEO of Vendy, a Silicon Beach technology startup.
I figured they got him to plead guilty by telling him they were going to bankrupt him with legal bills and then they were going after his son and bankrupt him too.
I guess it all comes down to how many victims the Mueller Mafia Gestapo KGB Stasi have to torture to get the ‘proof’ of a yet to be defined ‘crime’.
Bump!
Bump!
Scarlet is a hue of red. The contention that it is a color is a lie by the questioner.
This means either that Flynn is innocent and Mueller corruptly bullied him into a false guilty plea or that Comey lied under oath. Maybe Congress should send Mueller a criminal referral on Comey for lying to Congress, just to put Mueller between a rock and a hard place.
Scarlet is red, Mueller.
What’s mroe Red, scarlet or Mueller?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.