Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5 Things Barack Obama Said in His Weirdly Off-the-Record MIT Speech
reason.com ^ | Feb. 26, 2018 6:11 pm | Robby Soave|

Posted on 02/27/2018 7:40:00 AM PST by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: BenLurkin

1) CIA-fronts of Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo = Good

-—NOT!

Note the global nature of BHO’s remarks and that BHO personifies how those out of government, who want to use them to work against the elected administration, e.g., through intel, censorship, politically trending and promulgation, antagonisms toward conservatives, Christians, etc.

2) “[N]ot okay to deny the underlying science.” The arrests will begin soon.

3) Bread and circuses, bread and circuses!

4) “common sense” (See #2.)

[”No scandal can embarrass us”]

5) Corrupt Government employees (I know, I repeat myself) continue to pressure us [BHO, Deep State] for higher pay-offs.


41 posted on 02/27/2018 8:14:38 AM PST by rx (Truth Will Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

The FBI and Justice dept may be working 80 hours a week, but the current scandal shows us what they are really doing.


42 posted on 02/27/2018 8:15:27 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl

Hussein went on plenty of vacations. And I seriously doubt if he ever put in a 40 hour work week, let alone an 80 hour one.

He was just the Public Relations face for the shadowy cabal of anti-Americans who ran the White House for eight years.


43 posted on 02/27/2018 8:16:48 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

#5 - these morons who never worked a real job in their life think that government workers work as hard as private.

I’ve worked on both sides and I KNOW that is not true. The government jobs I’ve had to do were with some of the laziest, most back-stabbing, inconsiderate fools I’ve ever met. That is why I don’t want them running ANYTHING let alone health care.

But government elitists like him don’t know that.

Al Gore was another one- he actually said once that calling something “Good enough for government work” was a sign of quality- Who ever told him that must have been laughing their asses off!!!

“Good enough for government work” means any old piece of crap you can stuff into a box and ship- the government will pay for.

Here’s another stunner- there is no way to accept refunds and return crap, in the government.

We once bought a piece of software for $5000. The salesman lied his ass off, and when we got it, we found it did not do anything we needed. THEY KEPT IT! Why? because there is NO WAY TO PROCESS RETURNS.


44 posted on 02/27/2018 8:18:39 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
“We didn’t have a scandal that embarrassed us,” he said

jOkeass was not embarrassed by The New Black Panthers!

45 posted on 02/27/2018 8:20:10 AM PST by depressed in 06 (60 in '18.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A conversation with Obama...

Me: Hello.
Obama: Um, uh, uh, um, eh eh eh
Me: so what did you want to talk about?
Obama: Um, uh, um, uh, ah, uh and uh, um

And um, uh, uh so on and so on...


46 posted on 02/27/2018 8:22:11 AM PST by mindburglar (I have an above average brain stem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
Go ahead and add "The Fuddy Hoax" which used the military and several other agencies to corruptly carry out BHO's very personal agenda:

  Use of the US Military for a Weaponized Political Benefit (21:04)

  Falsified NTSB Investigation Frames Pratt & Whitney Canada (39:28)

  US Military Participates in The Fuddy Hoax (10:35)

47 posted on 02/27/2018 8:23:22 AM PST by rx (Truth Will Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
".. Public Relations face for the shadowy cabal of anti-Americans who ran the White House for eight years.

Yeah those are the ones I was talking about.

48 posted on 02/27/2018 8:24:18 AM PST by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: IncPen

//// Scandals?

• Benghazi
• Lois Lerner
• Chokepoint
• Fast & Furious
• Uranium One
• Bundy standoff

That’s just off the top of my head. /////

The key weasel word was “embarrassed.” Nothing EMBARRASSED them . . . for obvious reasons, NOTHING ever embarrasses them.


49 posted on 02/27/2018 8:25:44 AM PST by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The ‘Schroooom’ user has lost all his brain cells.


50 posted on 02/27/2018 8:29:58 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
It's not okay to deny the underlying science hoax.

The people who buy this crap will never know the results of their stupidity. But, their progeny will feel vindicated when the ice over Manhattan is only 3/4 mile thick instead of a mile.

Windmills will not work when ice reaches the blades.

51 posted on 02/27/2018 8:30:58 AM PST by depressed in 06 (60 in '18.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Nothing this maggot could say would impress me.


52 posted on 02/27/2018 8:48:34 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If nobody knows what he said, he can’t be challenged or criticized, and can claim that he had 100% approval in the speech. Kind of like Saddam Hussein always managed to get near 100% of the votes in Iraqi elections; the comparison is apt.


53 posted on 02/27/2018 9:03:17 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Barack still pushing his Marxist agenda under Socialism....


54 posted on 02/27/2018 9:07:54 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
""We didn't have a scandal that embarrassed us," he said. "


55 posted on 02/27/2018 9:32:09 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Reference Bump


56 posted on 02/27/2018 9:47:11 AM PST by Loud Mime (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
A natural born citizen is someone who is a citizen from birth under the laws that apply at the time, as opposed to an immigrant who must be naturalized before becoming a citizen. Any other definition mires you in absurdities that very, very few people would be willing to defend, such as saying that the born-abroad child of a U.S. serviceman and U.S. citizen wife, deployed in, say, Europe or Japan, is not a natural born citizen. The same goes for State Department and other government people who are routinely posted abroad, with their families, for long periods, as well as business expats, academics, etc.

"Under the laws that apply at the time" is an important caveat. We should do away with birthright citizenship and put an end to anchor babies and maternity tourism. If Maria slips across the border to deliver her baby in San Diego, fine, but the kid should remain Mexican, not American.

57 posted on 02/27/2018 10:10:36 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
#57 was of course the Ted Cruz position, and Cruz was right on that issue.

An ancient history detour. Cruz may be a sharp academic debater, but he missed a winning response when Trump raised the citizenship issue in the debates. Cruz made the intellectual's mistake of actually answering the question asked, which has never been the right way to debate someone like Trump, who is not tied to logical argument and who speaks elliptically. The way to answer a showman is with a better story.

When Trump raised the citizenship question, Cruz should have laughed and, with a big grin on this face, said: "Donald, before answering that, and just for the record, my family has been in this country a lot longer than yours." You can wordsmith it from there, but the fact is that Trump's mother was an immigrant, as was Cruz's father. But both of Trump's paternal grandparents were born in Germany, so Trump is only a second generation American on his dad's side. Cruz's maternal forbearers were a mix of mostly Irish and Italians coming over in the mid 19th century, but one strand of Cruz's family runs back in America at least to the early 18th century. Cruz should have had some Scots Irish frontier folklore at his fingertips.

From the standpoint of the rhetorical autopsy, Cruz spent too much time rooting his story in his dad's experience. This made sense in terms of the fight for freedom stump speech that was his bread and butter in the primaries. He would have been well served, however, to summon up other ghosts as well. Had I been advising him, I'd have suggested that he make a joke about how Trump would look good about as good in lederhosen or a kilt as he himself would look in a toga, so thank God we're all Americans. Or about how he'd spot Trump haggis and weinerschnitzel while Cruz could lay claim to pizza, fajitas and leprechauns. Conclude by saying, "But mostly I'm glad that we're Republicans so we don't have to play tribal identity politics like the Democrats. We're all Americans." Repeat it once in Spanish and then, "But bottom line, to answer your question, some of my ancestors were in this country 300 years ago, Donald. You're the newcomer on this stage."

Granted, this would not have directly answered the point Trump was making, but Trump wouldn't have known what hit him. I don't imagine that Cruz would challenge Trump for the 2020 nomination, but if he did, I hope he could find an ancestor who was with Washington at Valley Forge ... in response to your lurking citizenship question. His family has been here long enough for that.

58 posted on 02/27/2018 10:44:21 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: proust
I can’t think of a single issue I’ve ever agreed with him on, ever.

Yep.

How bad must a president be for a conservative FReeper like myself to say..."Ya know, back in 2008, Hillary might have been a better choice, at least on the Democrat side...."

59 posted on 02/27/2018 11:24:28 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

One is a natural born citizen because ones comes by that citizenship naturally, no law is needed.
Naturally one could only be an American citizen when one is born here of citizen parents.
When one has a foreign national parent or parents one acquires other nationalities and is no longer naturally an American.
The purpose of the natural born citizen requirement was to insulate the office from any foreign influence, John Jay said so in a letter to George Washington that still exists.
Children of foreign nationals born with divided nationalities, loyalties and allegiances were exactly who the founders were excluding.


60 posted on 02/27/2018 7:14:52 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson