Gonna be tough to pay off the college loans for underwater fire prevention degrees working at Starbucks...
The Democrat system on display.
The irony - the more that teachers and admins look the other way on failed tests and absenses, while graduating them anyway - the more students will fail tests and not attend classes.
Essentially, the cycle of socialism.
First of all, "accepted" doesn't mean they'll actually be going. Second, what kind of SAT/ACT scores did these students have? What colleges participated in this travesty of education accepted them?
The stunning thing is that it’s NPR reporting it.
It’s not unusual for kids in large high schools to just disappear and then re-appear for tests. Reason: You aren’t allowed to smoke weed in school or you have a job. They can’t flunk you, especially if you are a minority.
They are ready for jobs in the government, no need to go to college.
They can stick around in college just long enough to run up five figures in debt. Some favor the democrat schools are doing here.
“One in five students was absent more than present — missing more than 90 days of school.”
1 in 5 students.. missing more than 90 days of school.. absent more than present.
So school is only 90 days ?
It looks like the author also attended this same school.
I truly despise the modern educational establishment.
Every student is not bound for college. Get over it.
We raised four kids. The two oldest have associates degrees and are slowly continuing their education.
The third graduates as an Astronautical Engineer this May.
The fourth is a wise and intelligent young man who wants to work in some sort of trade. He starts his CDL class in March to become a truck driver.
Whether or not he sticks at that as a career, I don’t really care. It is a skill and a credential he can keep lifelong though.
Schools need to get off the college for all mentality.
Re-open vocational education.
And by all means, get rid of compulsory education ages. If a kid is going to be disruptive, jettison him.
Maryland raised their law to 17 a few years ago. What a miserable failure. If a 15 or 16 year old gang-banger wants to destroy his life and the lives of others in school, he shouldn’t be there, nor should the system require him. If he doesn’t show up and do the work, he shouldn’t get rewarded with a diploma he didn’t earn nor care about.
Now, in college, they can cut classes....... especially 8:00 ‘ers
The problem will be inequality. Intellectual inequality will strike and like Anita Hill in Washington, they will be faced with the reality.
So how did they get accepted to colig?
They lied to the student, to the parents, and to the taxpaying citizen.
The one question the article seemed to not even address is how in the h 100% of the kids got accepted at a college. With that kind of H.S. record, what could their SAT scores have been, on average? Or was every one of the kids given an “affirmative action” slot at a college?
I went to school with Pell Grant recipients who bragged about using that money to buy furniture, go on trips and other crap I couldn’t afford.
You’re welcome, you POSs.
We pretend to study, they give pretend diplomas
PENAL CODE
TITLE 8. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER 37. PERJURY AND OTHER FALSIFICATION
Sec. 37.10. TAMPERING WITH GOVERNMENTAL RECORD. (a) A person commits an offense if he:
(1) knowingly makes a false entry in, or false alteration of, a governmental record;
(2) makes, presents, or uses any record, document, or thing with knowledge of its falsity and with intent that it be taken as a genuine governmental record;
(3) intentionally destroys, conceals, removes, or otherwise impairs the verity, legibility, or availability of a governmental record;
(4) possesses, sells, or offers to sell a governmental record or a blank governmental record form with intent that it be used unlawfully;
(5) makes, presents, or uses a governmental record with knowledge of its falsity; or
(6) possesses, sells, or offers to sell a governmental record or a blank governmental record form with knowledge that it was obtained unlawfully.
(b) It is an exception to the application of Subsection (a)(3) that the governmental record is destroyed pursuant to legal authorization or transferred under Section 441.204, Government Code. With regard to the destruction of a local government record, legal authorization includes compliance with the provisions of Subtitle C, Title 6, Local Government Code.
(c)(1) Except as provided by Subdivisions (2), (3), and (4) and by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor unless the actor’s intent is to defraud or harm another, in which event the offense is a state jail felony.
(2) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental record was:
(A) a public school record, report, or assessment instrument required under Chapter 39, Education Code, data reported for a school district or open-enrollment charter school to the Texas Education Agency through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) described by Section 42.006, Education Code, under a law or rule requiring that reporting, or a license, certificate, permit, seal, title, letter of patent, or similar document issued by government, by another state, or by the United States, unless the actor’s intent is to defraud or harm another, in which event the offense is a felony of the second degree;
(B) a written report of a medical, chemical, toxicological, ballistic, or other expert examination or test performed on physical evidence for the purpose of determining the connection or relevance of the evidence to a criminal action;
(C) a written report of the certification, inspection, or maintenance record of an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, or other similar device used in the course of an examination or test performed on physical evidence for the purpose of determining the connection or relevance of the evidence to a criminal action; or
(D) a search warrant issued by a magistrate.
(3) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental record is a governmental record that is required for enrollment of a student in a school district and was used by the actor to establish the residency of the student.
(4) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental record is a written appraisal filed with an appraisal review board under Section 41.43(a-1), Tax Code, that was performed by a person who had a contingency interest in the outcome of the appraisal review board hearing.
(d) An offense under this section, if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental record is described by Section 37.01(2)(D), is:
(1) a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is committed under Subsection (a)(2) or Subsection (a)(5) and the defendant is convicted of presenting or using the record;
(2) a felony of the third degree if the offense is committed under:
(A) Subsection (a)(1), (3), (4), or (6); or
(B) Subsection (a)(2) or (5) and the defendant is convicted of making the record; and
(3) a felony of the second degree, notwithstanding Subdivisions (1) and (2), if the actor’s intent in committing the offense was to defraud or harm another.
(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution for possession under Subsection (a)(6) that the possession occurred in the actual discharge of official duties as a public servant.
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(5) that the false entry or false information could have no effect on the government’s purpose for requiring the governmental record.
(g) A person is presumed to intend to defraud or harm another if the person acts with respect to two or more of the same type of governmental records or blank governmental record forms and if each governmental record or blank governmental record form is a license, certificate, permit, seal, title, or similar document issued by government.
(h) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under Section 32.48 or 37.13, the actor may be prosecuted under any of those sections.
(i) With the consent of the appropriate local county or district attorney, the attorney general has concurrent jurisdiction with that consenting local prosecutor to prosecute an offense under this section that involves the state Medicaid program.
(j) It is not a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(2) that the record, document, or thing made, presented, or used displays or contains the statement “NOT A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT” or another substantially similar statement intended to alert a person to the falsity of the record, document, or thing, unless the record, document, or thing displays the statement diagonally printed clearly and indelibly on both the front and back of the record, document, or thing in solid red capital letters at least one-fourth inch in height.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1248, Sec. 66, eff. Sept. 1, 1989; Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 113, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 565, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 6, eff. May 21, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 823, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 659, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 718, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 771, Sec. 3, eff. June 13, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 198, Sec. 2.139, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 257, Sec. 16, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1364 (H.B. 126), Sec. 1, eff. June 18, 2005.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1085 (H.B. 3024), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 73 (H.B. 1813), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2009.
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1130 (H.B. 2086), Sec. 31, eff. September 1, 2009.
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 510 (S.B. 124), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2013.
Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 690 (H.B. 644), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2015.
And the taxpaying fools will be shelling out millions in state and federal funds to put these non-reading high school graduates in college. There they are marked for failure because they should not be there in the first place.
All subsidized education should be stopped. Students who can’t afford college should have to work to pay for it, as millions of Middle Class college graduates had to do in the past. If it’s YOUR money, you will show up in class and be sure to turn in work that will pass, instead of “hanging out” and skipping class and then whining that you are being discriminated against when you flunk out.
Idiocracy here we come.
Why would any parent want their children to be influenced by teachers, principals, and administrators who LIE to the student, the parents, and taxpayer?
Please check out post #38. They are also criminals.