Posted on 02/19/2018 3:30:06 PM PST by Louis Foxwell
Where Are the Indictments of Obamas Foreign Colluders? The collusion fraud continues. February 19, 2018 Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism.
The indictments are in.
Team Mueller indicted a bunch of Russians associated with a troll farm for interfering with an election in the United States. Russian troll farms generally dont follow United States law. But foreigners are not allowed to interfere with elections in the United States. Unless theyre named Christopher Steele.
The Clinton campaign employed a British foreign agent who used Russian intelligence sources to put together opposition research meant to interfere with the results of a United States election. Collusion between the Clinton campaign, Steele and the Russians doesnt require an endless fishing expedition.
Foreigners interfering in United States elections are not a new phenomenon. Muslims in Gaza famously ran a phone bank for Obama. A Hamas political adviser had declared that he hoped Obama would win.
There was no investigation. Nor did anyone indict the Gazans running the phone bank.
The indictment states that, the Federal Election Campaign Act prohibits foreign nationals from making any contributions, expenditures, independent expenditures, or disbursements for electioneering communications. But Obama had chosen to accept untraceable donations from abroad. He had failed to ask for proof of citizenship and his website had even allowed donations from Iran and North Korea.
The chair of Nigerias stock exchange had organized an Africans for Obama fundraiser. The Albanian Socialist Prime Minister had been accused of a scheme to transfer $80,000 to an Obama fundraising committee. Gazans bought and resold Obama t-shirts from the campaign website. And no indictments.
None of that counts as election interference. And none of it generated an investigation of Obama.
Indicting civilians covertly employed by a foreign government to engage in propaganda in the United States is an unserious act. But Obama Inc. responded in the same futile way to Chinese hacking efforts. Responding to cyberwarfare with toothless indictments is not how you head off the next attack.
But the indictments are also bad law.
Facebook Vice President of Ad Product Rob Goldman noted that most of the Russian ad spending took place after the election.
Specifically, "44% of total ad impressions" preceded the election while 56% were after the election.
We shared that fact, but very few outlets have covered it because it doesnt align with the main media narrative of Tump and the election, Goldman tweeted.
And thats what this is still about.
The indictment and previous research showed that the Russian troll farm had run a variety of scams across the spectrum. They posed as Black Lives Matter and Republican activists, as militant feminists, outraged Indians, as Islamists and anti-Islamists at the same time. Did Russia actually care about Black Lives Matter or Trump? About as much as that Nigerian prince in your email cares about your politics.
The Russian troll farms covered Black Lives Matter for the same reason that Al Jazeera does. Qatars Al Jazeera, Russias propaganda networks and the other foreign foes trying to influence Americans have a core agenda that they package inside content that Americans care about, but that they dont.
Qatar successfully packaged its campaign against Saudi Arabias struggle with Iran in Yemen by embedding its Yemeni famine myth inside a grab bag of social justice causes through Al Jazeera. Russia was doing the same thing with its online campaigns, embedding its pro-Assad Syria or anti-Ukraine propaganda by packaging it with a spectrum of partisan causes that Americans do care about.
Not only does the effort predate Trumps entry into the race, but even the indictment notes that the Russian troll farm outline had urged employees to use any opportunity to criticize Hillary and the rest (except Sanders and Trumpwe support them). Was there also collusion between Bernie Sanders and Russia? Despite Bernies Soviet honeymoon, this support had nothing to do with collusion.
The Russian troll farm was built on engaging the most politically active and dissatisfied Americans. Going after supporters of Sanders and Trump by pretending to share their views was most likely to pay off in social media shares and influence building. The Russian troll farm wasnt trying to change the outcome of an election. It was piggybacking on a current political controversy while playing both sides.
And, whether its the anthem or gun control, they went right on doing it after the election was over.
But, as Facebooks VP of Ad Product noted, it doesnt fit the medias collusion narrative. The central thesis of the post-election Dem conspiracy theory is that Hillary would have won if it werent for the Russians. (Not to mention misogyny, Comey and around three hundred other reasons.) Theres never been any evidence that the thousands spent on Facebook ads altered the outcome of the election.
But if the Russians werent trying to influence the election, then the conspiracy theory collapses.
The conspiracy theory that ate Washington D.C. and most of the media assumes that the Russians wanted to influence the election. And that they wouldnt have tried to do so of their own accord if there wasnt collusion. But Russian collusion had originated as a Clinton smear during the election. If you believe the foreign agent hired by the Clinton campaign, it may have originated with the Russians.
Thats much better evidence that Hillary was colluding with the Russians than that Trump was.
And if the Russians were conspiring with Trump, why were they also backing Bernie Sanders? If this conspiracy existed, why did American forces just take out 300 Russian mercenaries? Why did Trump go much further in helping Ukrainian forces against Russia than Obama was ever willing to? The Russians didnt spend much money on this conspiracy. They werent very consistent. And they didnt get anything for it. Thats much more consistent with social media influence building than the Manchurian Candidate.
Mueller and the media know all this. And they dont care.
Indicting the Russians for trying to influence the election is bad law, but it shows that Team Mueller intends to go after President Trump. The evidence that the Russians tried to interfere with the election is weak. The more conventional fraud charges would have made for a much stronger case.
But nobody gave Team Mueller millions just to find out that some Russians were engaging in fraud. The Russians are just the tools that the Democrats and their allies have weaponized to overturn the election.
Russian troll farms are not a threat to our elections. Despite the paranoid conspiracy theories, Russian Facebook ads had less impact on the election than Jill Stein. And if were going to indict foreigners who interfere in our elections, we can start with Obamas international cast of donors and supporters.
The real threat to our system of free elections is the refusal of the Democrats to accept defeat. When George W. Bush won, the Democrats rejected the outcome, invented conspiracy theories and protested in the streets. They did the same thing again when Donald J. Trump won. Theres a consistent pattern here and it doesnt involve Moscow or the Supreme Court. Those are just their excuses.
The Democrats have never accepted a Republican in the White House in this century. Forget the Supreme Court or Russia; its the Democrats who are the biggest threat to democracy.
Front Page mag - A Project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center
Daniel Greenfield Ping List Notification of new articles.
I am posting Greenfield's articles from FrontPage and the Sultan Knish blog. FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Greenfield ping list.
I recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.
FrontPage is a basic resource for conservative thought.
Lou
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post or notify me by Freepmail.
Where are the indictments of the domestic colluders who made the Kenyanesian Usurper?
Bttt.
5.56mm
Re-post of my comment from another thread:
IF we are so freaked out by Russias interference in our elections - why are we not incensed by Mexicos interference with OUR entire political structure??? How many ads have Mexican nationals produced in an in-your-face effort to influence OUR elections and elected officials? How many Mexican nationals have actually been elected, i.e., infiltrated OUR government at the local level, in order to circumvent OUR laws? How many booklets have the Mexican Government produced and published helping and even encouraging Mexican nationals to invade OUR country and access OUR social systems for the benefit of Mexico? I cant remember ever seeing hundreds of Russians take to OUR streets in protest of OUR laws and American interests. Why are we not holding Mexico and Mexicans in the same contempt as Russians for doing exactly the same thing - except exponentially more of it? Do they get a pass just because we have a long contiguous border? Will it really matter, in the end, WHO usurps OUR government???
Where Are the Indictments of Obamas Foreign Colluders?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
They all live in a sanctuary city?
The Communists, directed by Moscow, were meddling in our internal affairs in 1930 in an attempt to foment violent revolution and usher in the socialist state. This episode is no different from what they did 88 years ago:
This was the turning point for American black people embracing communism. You could almost argue Obama descended from this communist effort to radically influence American politics.
You’re correct. Tons of election year activity in the USA by non-US-citizen Mexican nationals. By legal green card holders, by legal student-visa holders, by flat-out illegals, and by gray-area “Dreamers”.
Only voluntary campaign work by foreigners is legal. Foreigners contributing money or buying ads is not allowed (except for perm-resident green card holders). Actual voting by folks in any of these categories is of course not allowed.
I bet the money contributed to Hillary by Mexican non-green-card-holders way exceeded any money the Russians spent on their aimless muckraking.
The left instinctively sides with evil. They will tend to ignore wrongdoing by their ilk, but will try to take down honest people.
Your post is hereby nominated for Post of the Year!
Taxman Bravo Zulu!
soebarkah will never go down, unless on the down low. Not even Trump can take him.
Soros and his son gave buckets of money to interfere with our elections, too. Aren’t they foreigners?
The Democrats have never accepted a Republican in the White House in this century.
Thank you ever so much Taxman!!!
How is it “almost” possible to argue from Obama’s Communist training? Both of his maternal grandparents were communists. His mentor through his teen years was a communist. His mother was a fellow traveler. His father was a Muslim linked to Nazism, a branch of communism. His years in Chicago were affiliated with the American communist party. Where can it be determined he was not communist?
You caught me in a generous moment. I agree with you. He used communist obfuscation and islamic taqiyya to hide who he really was. But it was readily apparent to anybody who studied his background and behavior.
Sometimes we miss the Real Issues!
The damage illegal aliens have done and are doing to America is a Real Issue!
And, it needs to be solved before America is reduced to a Third World Shithole country!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.