Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevcol

I have mixed feelings.

OTOH it is good to see the man’s paternal rights also being respected in a court of law. Until now, men were regarded as ATMs to be looted at the whim of any woman they impregnated, who got to take his money and do as she pleased.


4 posted on 02/17/2018 3:40:55 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bon mots
" it is good to see the man’s paternal rights also being respected in a court of law. Until now, men were regarded as ATMs to be looted at the whim of any woman they impregnated, who got to take his money and do as she pleased."

men don't have to impregnate anyone...in your case, I'd suggest just chopping it off if its so much trouble to control yourself..

and often, women are treated as a receptacle for a man's momentary sexual release, and then they complain about the consequences....

25 posted on 02/17/2018 3:54:59 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Bon mots
Maybe they should stop getting women impregnated as a first step to not getting their tender feelings hurt.

The only reason a man sort of won is because a Christian stepped up to the plate to get her child baptised. If she had sacrificed her daughter at a wiccan ceremony, she'd probably be hailed as a heroine.

60 posted on 02/17/2018 5:56:01 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson