I have mixed feelings.
OTOH it is good to see the man’s paternal rights also being respected in a court of law. Until now, men were regarded as ATMs to be looted at the whim of any woman they impregnated, who got to take his money and do as she pleased.
men don't have to impregnate anyone...in your case, I'd suggest just chopping it off if its so much trouble to control yourself..
and often, women are treated as a receptacle for a man's momentary sexual release, and then they complain about the consequences....
The only reason a man sort of won is because a Christian stepped up to the plate to get her child baptised. If she had sacrificed her daughter at a wiccan ceremony, she'd probably be hailed as a heroine.